I watched the domestic adaptation of Twelve Citizens many years ago and thought it was very good. I turned out this version in the new year, because I vaguely knew the general plot, and the Russian language really made people play. In the first voting, there was a negative vote, which was wonderfully presented. Everyone has a story in their hearts. The life of each person was gradually analyzed and gradually became vivid. I have read a lot of film reviews, and most of them feel that there is no guilt. The Russian version made me think about the last paragraph. When the Twelve Angry Men confirmed their innocence, the artist hesitated. He considered that it would be more dangerous if the child was released from prison, so he suggested that the child should be put in prison. Protect him later. I think everyone's hesitation in this paragraph is the finishing touch. Even the angry man who insisted on innocence has bluntly rejected it. People are first and foremost, and they can't be the real savior outside of their own conscience. very real. There is no so-called good and no so-called bad, there is no absolute black and white, and it is more a way of living that adapts to the so-called society.
The final ending is a little confusing. In the end, the teenager followed the artist, so who is the person who took off the blue cotton jacket and held it in his hand at the end of the film? In the end, did they still work together to rescue the boy and let him leave the artist successfully?
Suspense has spawned countless imaginations, and I wish everything was the best kind.
View more about 12 reviews
