Look at 2 first, then 1, then 3 a week later.
I like horror films that look like documentaries, with meticulous details echoing back and forth, every detail, and maintaining a logical or moral balance. Human life is really slim, and the feeling that fate is in control of everything invisibly, and the world's operating rules are unshakable, can people be greatly astonished and afraid.
When I first look at 2, the most profound highlight is the bloody serial car accident and the plot where the protagonist suddenly returns from a premonition.
Then the first guy died pretty well. He was slipped by the food scraps he had poured out of the window, and died indirectly.
Later, it became unreasonable, as if the god of death gradually lost patience and unreasonably took the lives of others in a vicious way.
The only rule is that water conducts electricity and oil leads to fire. Once any machine or stove explodes, it is as powerful as hiding a few TNT inside.
In fact, there are still suspense, but the logic doesn't make sense. The climax is to go to the hospital to find a new baby who broke the plan. The inspiration and expectation in the audience's heart seems to be watching "Lola Run"-of course, there is nothing wrong with it. But, please, this is a horror movie.
Look at 1, it turns out that the bridge section that returned from the premonition was the first here, and it was written by the director of the East.
No wonder he can perform more meticulously and delicately. I remember that in the scene, when everyone started to step into the plot of death, a burst of darkness suddenly appeared, growing and spreading, and quickly covering the whole surroundings, whether indoor or outdoor, it was covered by a vague darkness in a moment.
This dynamic is very appropriate to the state of "coming" in the title.
Compared with explosions and high-speed steel cutting limbs, the god of death, who controls the water marks, shadows and wind in the small beach, is more elegant and suffocating. This is the elegance of the Eastern style. I like.
The most terrifying thing is not death or death, but the "coming" process that he is approaching us and can't help fighting, and he can cling to your back no matter how to escape, overturning everything he has, and taking his life.
Compared to 2, I prefer 1 and 3. The attitude of those characters in facing death is much deeper than 2. 3 is a continuation of 1. Maybe the director wants to pursue a higher sublimation, so he adds the rules of using photos to imply the way of death. It is already very difficult to follow this rule to write a screenplay. But the answer sheet submitted is still satisfactory.
Also, the weird atmosphere of the opening amusement park in 3, and the roller coaster section, the sound effects and pictures are so wonderful that they can actually arouse my physical cold feeling, but I don’t feel that the spirit is too exciting to bear. This subtle measure Maybe the American director who pursues bloody horror will never understand it.
View more about Final Destination 3 reviews
