reread

Dolores 2022-03-22 09:02:11

After reading it for the first time, I naturally have a lot of doubts. I went to watch citizen kane, then read a little background material, and then watched movie reviews, listened to podcasts, and after a while, it made me more interested in this movie.

So I watched it again when I was free, and this time I thought I had more understanding of the background and could focus more on the lines and the movie itself. The lines are quite dense, and there is a sense of every word and every word has a role. The script felt solid, and many details I had to watch a second time to notice. Finch's director is indeed very precise. There are several scenes that can already be said to be classics, such as the scene where mank met Marion Davies and randolph hearst for the first time, and that mank took his younger brother to meet the MGM boss, A scene where they walk and talk on set. I still don't like the decision to deliberately imitate old black and white movies, I even think this movie would have no effect at all if it was shot in a normal way, and it would even look better, because black and white plus those gimmicky's tricks of imitating old movies actually hinder the audience from enjoying a lot The details also bring a certain sense of distance to the actors' such good performances. But if you understand his decision, he also did some interesting things, such as paying tribute to citizen kane's shooting technique. The music is also imitating that style, but it's pretty good, how can trent reznor/atticus ross be so talented.

This movie involves several topics. The first thing everyone saw was the dispute over the copyright of citizen kane's screenwriter, but after watching it, they found that it was only slightly involved, not what the movie wanted to discuss. You could say that part of it is a political satire borrowed from the past. Of course, it also depicts the inside story of Hollywood's golden age studios, not at all in the romantic color that is presented on the screen. And the struggles of the mank character. I think it's interesting to think of it just as a behind-the-scenes story about the origin of the script for the movie citizen kane. In short, this movie is not the kind of movie that you can watch once. I usually prefer to watch a movie to relax instead of doing my homework, but it is interesting to come to such a movie occasionally.

View more about Mank reviews

Extended Reading
  • Kiel 2022-03-26 09:01:08

    Hearst, the prototype of "Citizen Kane" (there are not many shots in the film, but the image of arbitrariness is really full) made every effort to prevent its release. Several studios such as LB Mayer and Warner refused to release the film in their theaters, causing RKO to release the film. The loss of $150,000 also deprived Welles of the final editing rights in subsequent filmmaking. The ps film favored Mank in the dispute over the authorship of Mank and Welles, but in the 1971 "Kane Development" incident, many parties and film and television researchers sided with Welles. In old age, Welles and Mank, who thought they were all good, looked really cynical.

  • Uriah 2022-03-25 09:01:12

    David Fincher's most neat, serious, dull work. The threshold for watching movies is extremely high, and it is necessary to do your homework before watching, otherwise at least half of the time will be cloudy and foggy, which is too picky for the audience.

Mank quotes

  • [a drunken Herman Mankiewicz sits at the corner of a large dinner table at an elaborate costume party, hosted by William Randolph Hearst and Louis B. Mayer. Instead of tinking on a glass to get the guests' attention, he slashes his glass with a knife. Gasps fill the room as he rises from his seat]

    Herman Mankiewicz: I've got a great idea for a picture, Louis. A picture I just know you're gonna love. It's a modern day version of Quixote!

    [Mank realizes his voice echoes through the room, but he continues, circling the table full of silent guests]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Now I know none of you read, but you know what it's about. A deluded old nobleman, who tilts at windmills. So how might we update this story?

    Butler: [whispers to Hearst] Do you want me to get someone?

    William Randolph Hearst: No.

    Herman Mankiewicz: How about we make our Quixote... a newspaperman? Who else could make a living tilting at windmills? But that's not enough... no, he wants more than readership. He wants more than adulation, he wants love. So, he runs for public office, and because he's notably rich, he wins... no, w-w-w-wait a minute. Notably rich and powerful, can't win over an audience unless notably rich and powerful sees the error of his ways in the final reel. Notably rich and powerful and making no goddamn excuses for it is only admirable in real life. Isn't that right, Louis?

    [Mayer glares at Mank as he drunkenly attempts to light his cigarette with the massive fireplace at the end of the room, unsuccessfully. Marion Davies takes a swig of her drink]

    Herman Mankiewicz: So what do we do? Anybody? We give him ideals! Ideals that any dirt-poor, depression-weary audience can identify with. Our Quixote is against crooked trusts, he's for the eight-hour workday, fair income tax, better schools. Why, he's even for government ownership of railroads. And you know what we call those people?

    Male Guest: Communists!

    Female Guest: Anarchists!

    Herman Mankiewicz: No, our Quixote, he's a two-fisted muckraker. In fact, someone predicts that he will one day win the presidency and bring about, get this...

    [laughing uncontrollably]

    Herman Mankiewicz: ... a socialist revolution!

    Louis B. Mayer: What a bunch of bullshit.

    Herman Mankiewicz: Is it? Tell him, Willie. Tell him.

    [Silence]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Upton Sinclair used exactly those words to describe a young William Randolph Hearst.

    Louis B. Mayer: [leaping from his seat] You miserable bastard!

    Herman Mankiewicz: [bowing] How do you do?

    [Some guests begin to leave the room, but Hearst's and Mayer's eyes stay on Mank]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Our Quixote, he hungers, he thirsts, he lusts for the voters to love him, love him enough to make him president, but they won't. And they don't. How do you suppose that could happen? Could it be because, in their hearts, they know he values power over people?

    [More guests leave as Mank approaches Hearst, still seated]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Disillusioned in Congress, he authors not one single piece of legislation in two terms. Can you believe that? That'll take some writing. Placed in nomination for president... it's too radical for the boys in the back, his bid goes nowhere! But we're doing something. We're building sympathy!

    [Even more guests leave]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Rejected, he flees to lotus land, where his faithful troll, Sancho, has prepared a mythical kingdom for...

    [Mank eyes Davies, stopping himself totally]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Wait a minute. I forgot the love interest! Her name: Dulcinea.

    [Every remaining head in the room turns to Davies]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Funny, adventurous, smarter than she acts. Ah, she's a... she's a showgirl! Beneath his social stratum, but that's okay because true love on the big screens, we all know is blind. And she... well, she loves him, too. So he takes her away to his m-mythical kingdom,

    [to butler]

    Herman Mankiewicz: can I get a bicarb?

    [back to the guests]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Now, along comes nemesis, that's Greek for any guy in a black hat, nemesis runs for governor, and he's a shoo-in to win. Why?

    [points to Hearst]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Because he's EXACTLY what our Don used to be! An idealist, ya get it? And not only that, nemesis is the same guy who once predicted that our Quixote would one day preside over a socialist revolution. Our Quixote looks into the mirror of his youth and decides to break this glass, a maddening reminder of who he once was. Assisted by his faithful Sancho

    [pointing to Mayer]

    Herman Mankiewicz: and armed w-with all the black magic at his command, he does just this. Destroying, in the process, not one man... but two.

    [Hearst is clearly furious, but maintains his composure]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Well, what do ya think, Louis? Hm? Do ya think it'll play?

    [Mank finally belches onto the floor. Any guest who hasn't already left does so]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Don't worry, folks. The white wine came up with the fish!

  • Herman Mankiewicz: Irving, you are a literate man. You know the difference between communism and socialism. In socialism, everyone shares the wealth. In communism, everyone shares the poverty.