The thing is a story of a daughter who is under control and who kills her mother who controls her. Even though the show is adapted, it is still based on facts, and I cannot accept this. And there are a lot of details in it that confuse me. In the play, the mother will not say anything when she sees her daughter standing up, which means that the mother knows and acquiesces. The daughter knows that her legs are not bad and can stand up and walk; the daughter also knows and tacitly agrees that she Her legs were not broken, and her mother made herself look like her legs were broken. So are they colluding or is the mother unilaterally deceiving her daughter? She always takes money from her savings, won't her mother find out that the money is missing? She always takes off the ventilator in the middle of the night, goes to drink Coke, eat cream, her mother is not too young, shouldn't she sleep very lightly, won't she be discovered by her mother? Does her mother really have agency Munchausen syndrome by making her look like that, or is it for profit, such as the recognition of people around her, financial support, etc. Mom doesn't allow Gypsy to dress up, so why does Gypsy have so many wigs and clothes, it seems that everything is placed in the closet generously, and there is no intention to hide it. Gypsy's mother doesn't let her eat sugar, so Gypsy won't lack nutrition? Can I take insulin when there is no problem with my health, will I not have low blood sugar? Gypsy has been in a wheelchair and still stands up to deny it? Won't the function of the legs decline? Wouldn't it be a problem to sit on the waist? She has been living in this environment, won't she get used to it? Will she be able to start a family again? Will she do the same thing as his mother hates his grandma but still does the same thing as her grandma, hates his mother controlling herself but still grows her own children like her mother controls herself?
View more about The Act reviews
