successful architecture

Glennie 2022-04-18 09:01:20

All I can say is ok. The director cleverly used the novelty of cooperation between the underworld and the police to attract the audience. The acting skills of the two male protagonists are excellent, so it is quite enjoyable to watch. This is undeniable. After seeing everyone calling them brothers and brothers drinking together, there is no sense of disobedience. The director is in The details of how black and white are mixed together are still very good. But stunts like serial murder suspense should not stop there. The biggest problem with this movie is that although the murderer has good acting skills, the characters are too flat. Why did the killing of his childhood shadows and other information explain too perfunctory, dig more backgrounds from Jiang Jinghu and create meaningful clues, so that the audience can feel that this case has traces to follow, not like the two in the movie. The male protagonist has always been passively chasing people when he sees them, and just looking for such jokes nearby when he can't see them. The funny thing is that, to a certain extent, the murderer was finally caught by himself. The final trial and the death penalty were also caused by him. The investigation ability of the Korean criminal police and the judicial system are very small here. Finally, I want to say that Ma Dongxi hammered the killer dog's head across the door and it was so handsome! New Korean male god!

Zachary 2022-04-18 09:01:20

The benefits of this film are all taken from Fritz Lang. The police and gangsters team up to catch serial killers is the plot framework of "M". Needless to say, there is also a group of gangsters who rushed out to find people after the schoolgirl was killed. That passion is there in Lang, too, and the murderer's rhetoric of questioning the legal system seems to have borrowed from Lang's "M" or "Fury." The choreographer's ability to plan the layout is quite poor. The murderer showed his face very early, but his behavior did not correspond to another line, and he looked fragmented; the character's character was not good, and the police were on his side anyway. For the sake of the big basic rules and other things such as basic etiquette are ignored, you want to solve the case, then you are amazing? It's annoying; the rhythm isn't right, and the murderer's indifferent attitude is meant to elicit his last real fear as a sign that he's being punished, but isn't this guy a bit over-the-top? Does it take half an hour to close? Including the various quarrels between the police and the leaders in front, can't you speak well when handling cases? The other party didn't get in your way, and this bridge still appears again and again. There is no style in the director, maybe I want to be old, but it doesn't work