Before watching the feature film, I had the MK2 version, so I first saw some of the highlights that came with the disc, including the director and the starring. In the interview, David Lynch, like his previous style, wears half-face sunglasses (Wang Jiawei brand?). He is a master of mysticism. During the interview, his interpretation of the film itself is silent. I only talked about the opinions of a few leading actors. During the interview, all the leading actors worshipped David Lynch, praised him for being easy-going and friendly, and felt very good about the rhythm of the movie, and agreed that David Lynch was very easy-going and friendly. Lynch is an amazing film art genius. Of course. The most unanimous thing about these actors is: I don’t know what story the director’s film is telling, and I don’t understand what the final result of the movie is.
Before watching the feature film, the old man also found the "Interview with David Lynch" and another article about David Lynch written by Xiao Sen. It is hard to imagine that Da Lin Weiqi did not do anything about this film. It is a detailed explanation, and Xiao Sen said very bluntly: I have studied seven plot structures about the movie with great interest, but because the countless links in the causal chain were roughly cut off, I was exhausted. Do it until you give up in despair.
With instant noodles in my mouth, I started to watch "The Wilderness of the Night" slowly, until the noodles were eaten, the cigarettes were full, the coke was drunk, the cast and crew subtitles were rising, and the 129-minute movie scene was in my eyes. Putting a crushing ellipsis, I can only say, I can only say, still confused, David Lynch drew countless small circles in my mind. The questions brought out in the movie are like a series of bullets fired from the barrel of an AK47, hitting the old man with blood and brains.
After watching the feature film, the old man also searched for some articles on the Internet. Some of them are slightly organized, but more of them are nonsense. He only likes to talk about techniques, expressiveness, and style. The story itself is completely the same. In a daze, some people simply scolded David Lynch as his mother, saying that the entire movie with such a high ID IQ was simply life-threatening. I absolutely agree with the last statement, just not scolding his mother.
The film is complicated for two reasons. One is that David Lynch intertwined fantasy and reality. When it seems to be going on all the time, it flashes the past tense from time to time. Sometimes it’s the past tense, but there is a future going on. Tense, past past tense, past present tense, etc. This is reminiscent of Nolan's genius and time to chase the director (magician, memory fragment). This kind of illusion of time is not so simple to distinguish reality and fantasy. Many people can only see this movie as MTV at first sight, except for the psychedelic music, silly characters, and the plot of ghosts. , You can't figure it out at all.
The second cause of confusion is that in this movie, David Lynch split the roles of two people into four people to perform, and in two completely different ways, the man was divided into two, and the woman was divided into two. Two into one. So when we were watching this "Monster Night Wilderness", we seemed to be looking at the trees in a kaleidoscope, sometimes a tree turned into two, and sometimes two unsimilar trees combined into a new tree. There was no division or union. Probable audiences can only regard this movie story as a novel by Henry Miller.
Of course, I am not a person with a particularly high ID, so I do not plan to bother to sort out the plot of the movie, and I am also a very wise person, knowing that if I do this, I will probably die in the script of David Lynch’s brother. under. So, here, I just want to briefly talk about some impressions of David Lynch. .
The reason why David Lynch is worshipped by many people is entirely because of his magical photography style and dark foggy images. In the film, David Lynch’s artistic allegories and accusations are even more important to him. One of the features of "Demon", in addition to this "Demon" film, there are also "Blue Velvet", "Muholland Road", these two movies are also with a strong David Lynch style, sharp darkness, anti The narrative style of the plot, adding the heart-to-heart agent to the story to urge the power of the soul, all shocked people's hearts, made people speechless, and made people have to worship the talented director once again in a ceremonial manner. Contrary to the others, the old man’s favorite work is precisely the movie that lacks the above-mentioned styles of him. It is called "The Story of Sturt". You can say that this movie is plain, and even affectionate, but I am more inclined to Understand that this movie is a classic and good movie full of warmth and heart-warming. And this movie is even more extreme with his first director's "The Elephant Man". Let me admit it shamelessly that "The Elephant Man" is a movie I can't stand. It's too dark and too sad. Too much teaches people to lose the courage to live, and too much to let people lose a sense of the goodness of human nature. Although I am one of the supporters of pessimism, I also know that the depths of human nature are sinful, but the current life has to go on. Self-comforting hypotheses deceive and be optimistic, which will make myself more courageous to live.
Oh, say so much inadvertently. Had to let it sink slowly.
Or traditional. . day. . Forgot to adjust the font back.
View more about Lost Highway reviews
