No Weibo. No Twitter. FB is rarely seen. IG has been used for many years, but I haven't added friends for many years. Work communication basically relies on Whatsapp, and WeChat Moments have been closed for a long time. The few Social Media mutes the notice at the moment of download. In fact, the mobile phone itself is in general mute state.
Regarding this movie, whether it is algorithm, addiction, business model, data supervision, industry moral conscience, etc., I believe that I feel the same as everyone else.
In view of the landlord's current coordinates, the touches that I want to mention here may be the discussion of social division and the crisis of trust in democracy, and of course, there are also the three-second interlude video clips of last year's Xiang K incident that appeared sneakily.
In fact, the social division in the film mainly describes the current situation in which American society is increasingly divided due to political differences, until the dilemma of people from different parties completely cutting off the space for discussion. This is the most serious social crisis the United States is currently facing. Of course, there must be at least one voice in the base of this crisis.
In somehow last year, Xiang K became one of the social carriers where two voices appeared, and the tearing was visible to the naked eye. Naturally, this tearing is also visible to the naked eye on different social media inside and outside the wall, which will not be discussed here. cause and effect. At the most intense stage, many friends would greet me while expressing extreme puzzlement. Of course, everyone knows about the event that the first ten episodes have been played here, and it is indeed easy to be confused by watching the eleventh episode. It doesn't even matter.
A little truth is revealed at 57'35'' in the film. . . “You start thinking how could these people be so stupid? They also see this information that I keep seeing, how can they not see the same information? The answer to the question is, they don’t see the same information.”
Thinking about the fact that at the beginning of last year, I would pay attention to the news on both sides at the same time, but soon they both gave up because they were too afraid of split personality. So never express any opinion, or discuss the event itself with anyone. Knowing that he is only the bottom worm, how can he see the whole chess game and reality. This is also another discussion in the film, whether everyone has lost the ability to distinguish the truth, because the priority of the algorithm itself tends to be profitable, not the truth. Even standing in front of the event at that moment seems to have lost the ability to judge the root cause of the event.
And whether it is yellow or blue, as mentioned in the film, they have been pushed to a more absolute and extreme position, which has also led to the tearing and differentiation of the entire society. 74'14'' in reality. In one chat, a local friend downplayed the threat he made to his mother before the vote last year, that if he voted in the opposing camp, he would not speak to her again. Of course, this is only the real situation that is happening among the many families here, or more between families and friends. As for the role and orientation of social networks in it, again, I have no way of distinguishing, and here I only make a statement of feelings.
Finally, talk about the three seconds of the chicken thief. If you pay attention, you will find that what you see is not what you hear, and what you hear is not what you see. Netflix is really a chicken thief, let alone the rest.
In the end, I wish world peace.
View more about The Social Dilemma reviews
