Let's start with the political metaphor: not the tsar was defeated, but the tsar had no resistance. Much like when the Qing Dynasty was overthrown in modern Chinese history, half of the provinces became independent in one day.…
But why are these people so happy? What did Comrade Lenin want to do when he declared to the outside world how hard the October Revolution was and how much suffering he suffered?
The film seems to have given the answer.
When I watched this movie, from the 10th minute, it was obvious that something was wrong. This is blatant sarcasm, and it's no wonder that Eisenstein dude called himself Russian and not Soviet until he died, even though Stalin was alive when he died. But it still doesn't affect who you choose to be.
This is enough for future generations of artists to emulate.
Art knows no borders. The director has only directed 25 films in his lifetime, but each of them points to what men like most, not beauty or alcohol, but the power that everyone dreams of having.
That's right, the world's first power master is none other than Sergey Eisenstein.
But at that time, shooting this kind of thing might kill my head. So this guy bet he couldn't understand, he used a lot of superb skills, these superb skills were later called montage, Sergei Eisenstein was one of the ancestors of montage, and the other was a great American David Griffith, as for the father of our Chinese film, everyone seems to want to be.
——————To be continued——————
View more about Battleship Potemkin reviews
