'Mank': How 'Citizen Kane' Was Made

Deontae 2022-03-21 09:02:24

Almost every review of the most classic films of all time places Citizen Kane in the top three, most of the time at the top, with praise for the film's director, producer, star and screenwriter Orson Welles, but hardly any Too many people mention co-writer Herman Mankiewicz. And Mankiewicz (referred to as Mank in the film) later insisted that the script for the film was written entirely by himself, eventually agreeing to share the title with Orson Welles for the money. While the matter has been controversial, Manki chose to believe him for the film, which tells the story of how Mankiewicz wrote Citizen Kane and what inspired the story.

I have to say that to watch this film, you really need to watch "Citizen Kane" first to understand the various background characters mentioned in it, and to understand how everything Manke experienced in Hollywood is displayed in "Citizen Kane".

David Fincher also showed Mank's Oscar-winning testimonial again at the end of "Mank": "I'm glad Orson Welles didn't accept the award with me because he wasn't there when I wrote the script." And try to prove that he is the only screenwriter. Although Citizen Kane was nominated for many Oscars that year, it finally won only the best screenplay award. This result also has a historical background, because Orson Welles was very opposed to the Hollywood filming system and was not popular in Hollywood, so the Oscars have always been unfavorable to him. But perhaps because of this background, later film critics and fans have always hoped to vindicate the film and kept pushing it to the altar.

The film shows how Mank succumbed to Monroe-blonde comedian Marion Davies (Amanda Seyfried) at a party in Hollywood, and heard a lot of gossip about media mogul William Randolph Hearst from her. That's where the script for Citizen Kane came from. Kane in "Citizen Kane" is based on Hearst, and Kane's second wife, Susan, a young singer who has been praised for a long time and could not succeed, is also based on Marion Davies. The only difference is that in Mank, you see Marion as Hearst's mistress, not his wife.

The film also uses several memory passages like "Citizen Kane" to let people know about Mank himself through the different characters Mank has come into contact with. But Mank was actually an alcoholic, a screenwriter who couldn't wait to make money at the time, and it didn't have much appeal in itself. At that time, he didn't care about his title in order to make money. Many scripts agreed not to be named, and he would leave if he took the money. Only when this one won an Oscar did he later regret it and tell the truth.

Gary Oldman's performance is still very vivid, although we may not know what Mank originally looked like, but at least the Mank he created is not boring, a man who often speaks ironically and is very gossip. I don't think it's a big problem to nominate again. Amanda Seyfried is indeed impressive in the film. Her role is not a completely simple-minded blonde beauty, but an actress who speaks lightly and humorously, has a lively and kind personality, but is also very gossip and is in the film. There are a lot of lines every time they appear in the film, which is really impressive in terms of acting skills.

The fun of watching this film is not to understand the background of "Citizen Kane", nor to understand the man Mank, but to see all kinds of characters in Hollywood at that time through Mank's experience, to understand the man who lived before World War II, has Hollywood without the halo of its golden age, and how it compares with today.

For example, Louis B. Mayer, the boss of MGM at the time, only appeared in a few short paragraphs, but it left a deep impression. He said: "You know why we waste a million dollars a year developing movies and they don't get made? Because they don't make me cry, they don't move me! How can I make my heart flutter? It just blows my brain. , my heart or my dixk!" The film also mentioned some competition between Warner, Paramount, MGM and other big studios, and the hypocrisy of people in the upper class. This feeling that it is easy to forget the original intention in pursuit of fame and fortune is exactly what Manke wants to express in "Citizen Kane".

At many parties in the film, we will see a lot of Hollywood bigwigs, actors and screenwriters talking about their views on politics and war. For example, Hollywood was before World War II. Although people were also against Nazis, they seemed to be against Hitler. What was done is not clear, but they were very much against it - communism. At the same time, the film also shows Hollywood's attitude towards the general election at that time. Contrary to now, the big Hollywood figures at that time were all supporters of the Republican Party and resolutely opposed the democratic-party candidates who maintained the idea of ​​"social-ism". , even at the expense of creating "fake news", which really has many similarities with the current era.

The film also often sees many white men smoking cigars in the office while researching and developing what kind of script to attract the audience. But that's a pattern that Hollywood has broken today. What kind of movies make money is no longer decided by a few old white men. A lot of these comparisons about the film industry make people see that Hollywood is really big these years.

At the same time, the United States in the late 1930s and early 1940s also experienced an economic crisis. People could not afford movie tickets and began to gradually stop going to the theater. The Hollywood studio bosses were also very anxious: how to bring the audience back cinema?

Ironically, when Manke wrote "Citizen Kane", the studio also gave hope that the film would make money, but it was also a failure at the box office. Although it is hailed as a classic, in fact, whether in the 1940s or at present, movies such as "Citizen Kane" are not necessarily box-office movies. Just as "Mank" itself is a Netflix movie, at least David Fincher didn't need to worry about how much it sold at the box office, he just made a movie he wanted to make, just to commemorate the Hollywood of that year. Throughout the movie, Netflix can be heard saying: Citizen Kane, if it were present, would be ours.

View more about Mank reviews

Extended Reading
  • Crystel 2022-04-23 07:03:00

    The full two stars, the theme, narrative and story are so-so, but for the good luck that the 1993 class may have, I hope Finch can fulfill his long-cherished wish and win the gold medal. It is best to have a grand slam and one star for friendship. .

  • Name 2022-04-23 07:03:00

    Even if you use feelings to pull everything, even if you are sophisticated, even if Oldman and Amanda shine, they can't hide the boring, cumbersome and old-fashioned movie.

Mank quotes

  • [a drunken Herman Mankiewicz sits at the corner of a large dinner table at an elaborate costume party, hosted by William Randolph Hearst and Louis B. Mayer. Instead of tinking on a glass to get the guests' attention, he slashes his glass with a knife. Gasps fill the room as he rises from his seat]

    Herman Mankiewicz: I've got a great idea for a picture, Louis. A picture I just know you're gonna love. It's a modern day version of Quixote!

    [Mank realizes his voice echoes through the room, but he continues, circling the table full of silent guests]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Now I know none of you read, but you know what it's about. A deluded old nobleman, who tilts at windmills. So how might we update this story?

    Butler: [whispers to Hearst] Do you want me to get someone?

    William Randolph Hearst: No.

    Herman Mankiewicz: How about we make our Quixote... a newspaperman? Who else could make a living tilting at windmills? But that's not enough... no, he wants more than readership. He wants more than adulation, he wants love. So, he runs for public office, and because he's notably rich, he wins... no, w-w-w-wait a minute. Notably rich and powerful, can't win over an audience unless notably rich and powerful sees the error of his ways in the final reel. Notably rich and powerful and making no goddamn excuses for it is only admirable in real life. Isn't that right, Louis?

    [Mayer glares at Mank as he drunkenly attempts to light his cigarette with the massive fireplace at the end of the room, unsuccessfully. Marion Davies takes a swig of her drink]

    Herman Mankiewicz: So what do we do? Anybody? We give him ideals! Ideals that any dirt-poor, depression-weary audience can identify with. Our Quixote is against crooked trusts, he's for the eight-hour workday, fair income tax, better schools. Why, he's even for government ownership of railroads. And you know what we call those people?

    Male Guest: Communists!

    Female Guest: Anarchists!

    Herman Mankiewicz: No, our Quixote, he's a two-fisted muckraker. In fact, someone predicts that he will one day win the presidency and bring about, get this...

    [laughing uncontrollably]

    Herman Mankiewicz: ... a socialist revolution!

    Louis B. Mayer: What a bunch of bullshit.

    Herman Mankiewicz: Is it? Tell him, Willie. Tell him.

    [Silence]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Upton Sinclair used exactly those words to describe a young William Randolph Hearst.

    Louis B. Mayer: [leaping from his seat] You miserable bastard!

    Herman Mankiewicz: [bowing] How do you do?

    [Some guests begin to leave the room, but Hearst's and Mayer's eyes stay on Mank]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Our Quixote, he hungers, he thirsts, he lusts for the voters to love him, love him enough to make him president, but they won't. And they don't. How do you suppose that could happen? Could it be because, in their hearts, they know he values power over people?

    [More guests leave as Mank approaches Hearst, still seated]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Disillusioned in Congress, he authors not one single piece of legislation in two terms. Can you believe that? That'll take some writing. Placed in nomination for president... it's too radical for the boys in the back, his bid goes nowhere! But we're doing something. We're building sympathy!

    [Even more guests leave]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Rejected, he flees to lotus land, where his faithful troll, Sancho, has prepared a mythical kingdom for...

    [Mank eyes Davies, stopping himself totally]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Wait a minute. I forgot the love interest! Her name: Dulcinea.

    [Every remaining head in the room turns to Davies]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Funny, adventurous, smarter than she acts. Ah, she's a... she's a showgirl! Beneath his social stratum, but that's okay because true love on the big screens, we all know is blind. And she... well, she loves him, too. So he takes her away to his m-mythical kingdom,

    [to butler]

    Herman Mankiewicz: can I get a bicarb?

    [back to the guests]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Now, along comes nemesis, that's Greek for any guy in a black hat, nemesis runs for governor, and he's a shoo-in to win. Why?

    [points to Hearst]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Because he's EXACTLY what our Don used to be! An idealist, ya get it? And not only that, nemesis is the same guy who once predicted that our Quixote would one day preside over a socialist revolution. Our Quixote looks into the mirror of his youth and decides to break this glass, a maddening reminder of who he once was. Assisted by his faithful Sancho

    [pointing to Mayer]

    Herman Mankiewicz: and armed w-with all the black magic at his command, he does just this. Destroying, in the process, not one man... but two.

    [Hearst is clearly furious, but maintains his composure]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Well, what do ya think, Louis? Hm? Do ya think it'll play?

    [Mank finally belches onto the floor. Any guest who hasn't already left does so]

    Herman Mankiewicz: Don't worry, folks. The white wine came up with the fish!

  • Herman Mankiewicz: Irving, you are a literate man. You know the difference between communism and socialism. In socialism, everyone shares the wealth. In communism, everyone shares the poverty.