——A Gore
The film received good reviews, and its protagonist, Gore’s reputation, was growing, and since then he won the Nobel Prize and in the political arena, people have re-referenced the man who was once the only one from the Oval Office. The Democrats who are one step away, no, should be said to be the Democrats who entered the White House and were pulled out.
In fact, in terms of personal viewing experience, this documentary still has not escaped the stereotype of global warming. It should be said that the audience level of this film is not low, and it is not a purely appealing film to arouse people's feelings. Of course, More on this later. Yet in its scientific part, it is hardly "knowledge" but "common sense" for us. What Gore does is reinforce the common sense that already exists in our hearts. Of course, another aspect of his success was adding personal experience and a nice theme track - which also helped him win an Oscar.
It is still cheesy to sigh about Gore's situation. As far as the matter is concerned, Al Gore's film is a comprehensive harvest in terms of the quality of the film and the reputation it has obtained. However, the opposite thinking is that Gore has traveled all over the world. He has made more than 100 similar reports around the world, but he is unknown. However, because this speech was cleverly edited and put on the screen, people's enthusiasm for him has been reawakened, so that he won the Nobel Peace Prize and was considered the president again. The qualified successor of , isn't this another kind of antinomy to Gore himself?
Many concepts of environmentalism are actually not opposed, or are often affirmed, but how to re-infuse those almost like laws and axioms into the minds of the public, so as not to make people objectionable, is actually a very technical problem. work. My personal view of environmentalism is this, and that is, even doing very little, there is more to gain from the people's perspective than to make a major breakthrough in science.
Gore is well-suited for the job.
Its conception has been challenged for four reasons.
On the one hand, calm but not fanatical. When Gore was running for president, the TV debate was considered to be more than calm but not enthusiastic. In fact, it shows that his words as president are more pedantic, and in this job, such a quality is absolutely required of. Because facing one of the most high-profile public topics in the world and facing a very broad audience, as a former political figure, Gore has to do that. In many western countries, environmental protection organizations have a bad reputation. There are two main reasons. One is that they interfere too much in politics, such as the Green Party in Germany. Environmental protection should be included in the government's agenda. Of course, it is understandable for environmental protection organizations to enter the political process. However, environmental protection itself is only a very small aspect of politics. Taking environmentalism as the governing program is too narrow. The second is that environmental protection organizations in many countries are too organized and fanatical, and have almost developed into cults—in fact , some have been identified as cults, including the "Long Live the Earth" in the United States, which is almost the same in nature as the Ku Klux Klan. unscrupulous process.
Gore is good at speeches (at least as reflected in this movie), but unlike the general public speech, although you can hear laughter and applause, most of the time the audience is quiet, not like Hitler's speech description and The highly incendiary and extreme popular fanaticism reflected in Martin Luther King's speech, although the latter is thought to be a better speech, is, in fact, far more dangerous. Gore overcame the politician's inherent idiosyncrasies and looked professional.
Second, Gore successfully brought out some examples to stop the opposition, such as comparing the earth with gold nuggets. These examples are very common and vivid, but the explanation in this regard has always been some environmentalism in the past. A common weakness of speaker speeches is that there are too many positive narratives to prove, ignoring negative rebuttals, we always say how dangerous "Mother Earth" is, and how meaningful environmental protection measures are, but we do not refute Issues such as "economics and environmental protection" and what we have been avoiding is that we cannot see the future of environmental protection.
Human beings are always very short-sighted. When they don’t see the end of the earth, they always don’t care about what will happen. It is a common problem for all human beings that they will not die until they reach the Yellow River, and they will not cry without seeing the coffin. If we can't come up with that shocking consequence, we'll never be able to convince those who "believe in that theory, but don't want to act", which is the only point of dissatisfaction with Gore's film. Not sure, he put some "acquired" shots, the effect obtained in the ppt will be better.
Third, and most unique, Gore has added his personal experience, which is very commendable, because his words and actions now prove that he does not want to return to Congress as an environmentalist - in fact, this is a pair of It's easy for him now. He rationally faces up to his defeat in the general election and his own child's death. But the most touching thing is that he mentioned his experience of returning to the farm. I think , There are very few people who will not be touched by this paragraph at all. Everyone has different experiences in environmental protection. Instead of saying that they are for the sake of all mankind - this is a joke, and it is a joke to anyone. Yes, it would be more convincing to publish your own mental journey.
At this point, Gore succeeded.
In addition, unlike many politicians, Gore's practice in environmental protection makes his words very convincing. Without investigation, there is no right to speak. Gore has reached two "canaries in the coal mine". , South Pole and North Pole, which makes his words carry weight.
At this point, Gore succeeded again.
View more about An Inconvenient Truth reviews
