Unanimous approval thought sloppy? Criminal's life is life? Could it be that the Virgin is haunted? He also said that I had already voted for my acquittal and tried my best to save the child, but the minority obeyed the majority and could only pass unanimously. (But it is also mentioned in the contract of the good film that if there is a reasonable doubt, if there is a slight doubt, he should be judged innocent. It does not mean that he did not kill, but that the existing evidence cannot fully explain his guilt. The first layer seems to be protection. That child, the second layer is actually to protect these decision makers, because one of their decisions will decide the life and death of the child, protect their conscience from being too blamed) The votes are all following the crowd and have no opinion, so request anonymity? Then a second ally who voted not guilty came into being, just because he felt that the lawyer who defended the child did not get money, just because the child was poor, so he did not try his best to defend the child (the negative party believed that the child's evidence was conclusive and did not need to be defended), so he did not Agree to vote guilty. One member of the jury pretended to be using the ballot paper as if he was taking drugs, and the other tried it decently, not knowing that he was trying something that could be harmful, just out of curiosity, no matter what it was. (Symbols can only cast judgment, regardless of regret and madness that happened?) A story, my wife worked three jobs to support my family, when I invented new patents, although the institute congratulated me and awarded me I paid 50 rubles, but I took it all home to my wife. My wife was surprised. Some foreign research institutes wanted to buy it at a high price. I didn’t agree and wanted to leave it to my motherland. Although everyone around me congratulated me, no one wanted to buy it. Eventually I ran out of money, my wife left me, and I was an alcoholic. When death comes, I feel like I'm relieved, but every time I get away with it. I was like a homeless dog licking its wounds in the dark, drowning in a painful past and heartbroken. I was afraid of the painful way to die. Once when I was on a train, I went crazy with alcohol and cursed. I was happy for my shamelessness. I wish someone would throw me out of the car window and hit the rails and die, but Everyone just sat quietly, no one cared about me, and didn't even look at me. Only a little girl of five or six years old said to her mother, that person is crazy and I am afraid. But the woman only said that he was not crazy, just too sad. Then the patent was sold to a foreign company and I got my job again, but it didn't matter anymore, the woman on the train became my wife, the girl became my daughter, and we have a son. (This is the Virgin?) Maybe that kid should have died in prison and I should have died on the street, but I didn't because there was someone who cared about me a little more than everyone else and got me out of that , blindly sinking and suffering a life. To be honest, this story is very touching. It's just that this is your story, and you didn't kill anyone. But what we're talking about now is a well-documented murder case. Anything is possible, starting with a dagger. . The story of the third person who voted acquittal begins with nonsense: Uncle Kulia drank a little wine on the day of the paycheck, never played slot machines, didn't expect to lose all, and also lost on loan sharks, and finally decided to take The gun at home went back to the company's financial room to take the hostages for money. The police and snipers were in place. They originally planned to kill him as a terrorist. Unexpectedly, the police chief came in unarmed to negotiate. In the end, Uncle Culia drank vodka with the chief. In the end, it was over and the debt was paid off. Prove that the director did not act according to the rules (because he was a terrorist, he was shot), and he was tolerant, so he should be tolerant to good people (regardless of whether the child killed his innocent adoptive father), and punished bad people, so he voted innocent. The fourth voted acquittal, because the 100 percent vote delayed him from the tour. (But they said before that they are responsible for their votes, so they just voted) The fifth vote of acquittal, because he thinks that if the kid is a real Caucasian, his moral code does not allow him to commit the following crimes, if he He was not a Caucasian, and he would not foolishly kill his adoptive father because of his pension. He returned to the scene with the money on him, so he was suspicious. Then it started to discuss that no one on our jury went to the crime scene, and the only witness who claimed to have heard the child say he was going to kill his father would have perjured even though he was an old Communist? Then it comes to whoever says that party members are just, that they have rights to contend for and interests to gain. Then someone said that party members in some areas are very public servants. Finally, the on-site restoration begins. Through on-site restoration, perhaps what the rheumatism old man saw was not a child, but just a figure. Thus the 6th and 7th acquittal votes were produced. Just because the police believed the old man's words and the audience believed the police's words, it seems too easy to close the case as to whether the old man told the truth. You keep giggling, why? Just terrified of serious life. When I talked to them about my attitude to life, about everything that was going on around me, they were all laughing. If I'm on stage and spit into the audience in the first row, maybe they're laughing too. I'm not a clown, ask them to have fun with someone else. (Look for a place that can accommodate their laughing life, this is not a world where entertainment is in power, please put away your hippie smiling face, it seems that you can laugh at everything, it is just that you are facing cruel life. Disapproval ended up just numb and self-pity for not caring about everything) and then talking about the grandmother of one of the jury members, When he was sick and waiting for the ambulance, he kept talking to his grandmother, pretending to be the neighbor's humorous person to make grandma in pain laugh, and he voted not guilty because he saw from the child, from the old man, When I am as lonely as my grandmother, it may be because of age or experience, no one can tell, and there is no way to talk about it. Maybe laughter at this time is the greatest relaxation for myself, but at the same time, it will relieve my pain and increase my self-esteem. numbness. Another story began. The murdered adoptive father was a soldier. He, the old man and his adopted son were all nail households, and the place where he lived was already being demolished. The old man's address changed when he served as a witness after the soldier's death, because he was afraid that he would also be killed? Therefore, the soldier's death may not be the child's killing, but the construction company hired someone to kill, because the construction period is tight and the construction must be started quickly. Taking such a little risk for money is trivial, but now who can withstand this temptation? How did you know? Just hearsay. When everyone started to vote acquittal, the acquittal votes began to increase again. It is not that everyone has no opinion, but they will always obey the mainstream. A little incentive may doubt that their position is different or the same as others? thereby being submissive or different. Another story, the head of the cemetery told me that during a burial, an unknown old lady was also beside her. When she was about to leave, she said to her family, "You see that the cemetery is wet, it's not good." The family also felt that this was the case, and hoped that the grave diggers could move to another cemetery. In the end, a good price was negotiated, and the old lady also got the fee. After it was all over, the plastic film under the original wet cemetery was taken out. After 15 minutes, the land was dry. There is a way to make money. So, how did your Rolex come to be? That's right. But I also do charity, build churches, and give alms to the poor. In the place where I was born, I built a school with all kinds of facilities, advanced and highly artificial. The local people don't know where the money comes from, as long as they can go to school, as long as they can receive education. Who cares where the money comes from, no one cares. It's a good thing to use dead people's money to help the living, except me. (To make up for my deceitful behavior, I feel at ease, and I feel that the rich people earn their money from the poor, and earning the rich people’s money to help themselves and the poor also feel at ease? This is what is called finding a balance?) The eighth acquittal ticket produce. There is a locked piano, a free bird entering this originally enclosed space, and those old pipes, missing aesthetic education, freedom and imprisonment, human affection and legal network, discussion and change, and then Say the one in the apartment across the street The woman also gave perjury, because from the evidence she gave to the court, she knew this soldier and that adopted son, and she wanted to know the soldier, so she wrote in Chechen that the soldier's wife had committed adultery. The wife was divorced, and the woman thought that the soldiers would have a chance when they came back, but she did not expect to bring a Chechen child back. Later, she invited soldiers and children to be guests at the party. At the party, she said that the child stole the money, but later in the court, she said that it was put elsewhere (responsible for what she said), and the perjury that the woman made was She saw from the window that the child was slapped by the soldier and then stabbed the soldier from top to bottom with a dagger. (The above are all jury brain supplements) Ninth, ten acquittal votes have been issued. The child may be because of countless domestic violence by his family. Generally, he is pitiful and innocent. After the father went to work, the stepfather and stepmother hurt him even more. This adoptive father and adopted son may also be. They are not related by blood but maintain a family relationship. The tension and hypocritical family relationship that is always guarded makes the child unable to control his emotions and treats everyone. Those who are educated can only smile, once the collapse is a tragedy? When everyone was ready to vote unanimously, a guilty vote came out, just because he felt that letting the child out of prison at this time might avenge the adoptive father, even if they all felt that the child was not the murderer, and the court would be because of them. If the case is re-investigated by acquittal, the child will not celebrate his release at this time. The person who actually murdered his adoptive father would kill the child, and the child may not be able to find those people. If we acquit the child, the child will be killed, those people don't care about the child's life or death, just gag his mouth, maybe in a few months, his body will be found in the sewer, this Things will be over. I feel that there has been attention to this verdict. Then he felt that the child should be put in prison first, and then the 12 of them went to the district prosecutor's office to explain the reasoning results and possible facts, and then let the child out of prison after finding the real murderer. After that, 11 people other than him started to have no time to do this for various reasons, even if they wanted to, they were powerless. Finally, one person concluded that we have fulfilled our jury duty, and it is not our responsibility to take care of the future. The person who finally concluded said that forty years later, our debate continues, but has everything changed? Like these old plumbing of the new school next to this courthouse, the debate is always there, but how many people are going to change? Law is above order, but what if mercy is above law She wanted to get acquainted with this soldier, so she wrote a letter in Chechen saying that the soldier's wife had committed adultery. At that time, the soldier was fighting in Chechnya, so he divorced his wife. The woman thought that the soldier would have a chance when he came back, but she didn't expect to bring a Chechen child back. Later, she invited soldiers and children to be guests at the party. At the party, she said that the child stole the money, but later in the court, she said that it was put elsewhere (responsible for what she said), and the perjury that the woman made was She saw from the window that the child was slapped by the soldier and then stabbed the soldier from top to bottom with a dagger. (The above are all jury brain supplements) Ninth, ten acquittal votes have been issued. The child may be because of countless domestic violence by his family. Generally, he is pitiful and innocent. After the father went to work, the stepfather and stepmother hurt him even more. This adoptive father and adopted son may also be. They are not related by blood but maintain a family relationship. The tension and hypocritical family relationship that is always guarded makes the child unable to control his emotions and treats everyone. Those who are educated can only smile, once the collapse is a tragedy? When everyone was ready to vote unanimously, a guilty vote came out, just because he felt that letting the child out of prison at this time might avenge the adoptive father, even if they all felt that the child was not the murderer, and the court would be because of them. If the case is re-investigated by acquittal, the child will not celebrate his release at this time. The person who actually murdered his adoptive father would kill the child, and the child may not be able to find those people. If we acquit the child, the child will be killed, those people don't care about the child's life or death, just gag his mouth, maybe in a few months, his body will be found in the sewer, this Things will be over. I feel that there has been attention to this verdict. Then he felt that the child should be put in prison first, and then the 12 of them went to the district prosecutor's office to explain the reasoning results and possible facts, and then let the child out of prison after finding the real murderer. After that, 11 people other than him started to have no time to do this for various reasons, even if they wanted to, they were powerless. Finally, one person concluded that we have fulfilled our jury duty, and it is not our responsibility to take care of the future. The person who finally concluded said that forty years later, our debate continues, but has everything changed? Like these old plumbing of the new school next to this courthouse, the debate is always there, but how many people are going to change? Law is above order, but what if mercy is above law She wanted to get acquainted with this soldier, so she wrote a letter in Chechen saying that the soldier's wife had committed adultery. At that time, the soldier was fighting in Chechnya, so he divorced his wife. The woman thought that the soldier would have a chance when he came back, but she didn't expect to bring a Chechen child back. Later, she invited soldiers and children to be guests at the party. At the party, she said that the child stole the money, but later in the court, she said that it was put elsewhere (responsible for what she said), and the perjury that the woman made was She saw from the window that the child was slapped by the soldier and then stabbed the soldier from top to bottom with a dagger. (The above are all jury brain supplements) Ninth, ten acquittal votes have been issued. The child may be because of countless domestic violence by his family. Generally, he is pitiful and innocent. After the father went to work, the stepfather and stepmother hurt him even more. This adoptive father and adopted son may also be. They are not related by blood but maintain a family relationship. The tension and hypocritical family relationship that is always guarded makes the child unable to control his emotions and treats everyone. Those who are educated can only smile, once the collapse is a tragedy? When everyone was ready to vote unanimously, a guilty vote came out, just because he felt that letting the child out of prison at this time might avenge the adoptive father, even if they all felt that the child was not the murderer, and the court would be because of them. If the case is re-investigated by acquittal, the child will not celebrate his release at this time. The person who actually murdered his adoptive father would kill the child, and the child may not be able to find those people. If we acquit the child, the child will be killed, those people don't care about the child's life or death, just gag his mouth, maybe in a few months, his body will be found in the sewer, this Things will be over. I feel that there has been attention to this verdict. Then he felt that the child should be put in prison first, and then the 12 of them went to the district prosecutor's office to explain the reasoning results and possible facts, and then let the child out of prison after finding the real murderer. After that, 11 people other than him started to have no time to do this for various reasons, even if they wanted to, they were powerless. Finally, one person concluded that we have fulfilled our jury duty, and it is not our responsibility to take care of the future. The person who finally concluded said that forty years later, our debate continues, but has everything changed? Like these old plumbing of the new school next to this courthouse, the debate is always there, but how many people are going to change? Law is above order, but what if mercy is above law The servant boy is back. Later, she invited soldiers and children to be guests at the party. At the party, she said that the child stole the money, but later in the court, she said that it was put elsewhere (responsible for what she said), and the perjury that the woman made was She saw from the window that the child was slapped by the soldier and then stabbed the soldier from top to bottom with a dagger. (The above are all jury brain supplements) Ninth, ten acquittal votes have been issued. The child may be because of countless domestic violence by his family. Generally, he is pitiful and innocent. After the father went to work, the stepfather and stepmother hurt him even more. This adoptive father and adopted son may also be. They are not related by blood but maintain a family relationship. The tension and hypocritical family relationship that is always guarded makes the child unable to control his emotions and treats everyone. Those who are educated can only smile, once the collapse is a tragedy? When everyone was ready to vote unanimously, a guilty vote came out, just because he felt that letting the child out of prison at this time might avenge the adoptive father, even if they all felt that the child was not the murderer, and the court would be because of them. If the case is re-investigated by acquittal, the child will not celebrate his release at this time. The person who actually murdered his adoptive father would kill the child, and the child may not be able to find those people. If we acquit the child, the child will be killed, those people don't care about the child's life or death, just gag his mouth, maybe in a few months, his body will be found in the sewer, this Things will be over. I feel that there has been attention to this verdict. Then he felt that the child should be put in prison first, and then the 12 of them went to the district prosecutor's office to explain the reasoning results and possible facts, and then let the child out of prison after finding the real murderer. After that, 11 people other than him started to have no time to do this for various reasons, even if they wanted to, they were powerless. Finally, one person concluded that we have fulfilled our jury duty, and it is not our responsibility to take care of the future. The person who finally concluded said that forty years later, our debate continues, but has everything changed? Like these old plumbing of the new school next to this courthouse, the debate is always there, but how many people are going to change? Law is above order, but what if mercy is above law The servant boy is back. Later, she invited soldiers and children to be guests at the party. At the party, she said that the child stole the money, but later in the court, she said that it was put elsewhere (responsible for what she said), and the perjury that the woman made was She saw from the window that the child was slapped by the soldier and then stabbed the soldier from top to bottom with a dagger. (The above are all jury brain supplements) Ninth, ten acquittal votes have been issued. The child may be because of countless domestic violence by his family. Generally, he is pitiful and innocent. After the father went to work, the stepfather and stepmother hurt him even more. This adoptive father and adopted son may also be. They are not related by blood but maintain a family relationship. The tension and hypocritical family relationship that is always guarded makes the child unable to control his emotions and treats everyone. Those who are educated can only smile, once the collapse is a tragedy? When everyone was ready to vote unanimously, a guilty vote came out, just because he felt that letting the child out of prison at this time might avenge the adoptive father, even if they all felt that the child was not the murderer, and the court would be because of them. If the case is re-investigated by acquittal, the child will not celebrate his release at this time. The person who actually murdered his adoptive father would kill the child, and the child may not be able to find those people. If we acquit the child, the child will be killed, those people don't care about the child's life or death, just gag his mouth, maybe in a few months, his body will be found in the sewer, this Things will be over. I feel that there has been attention to this verdict. Then he felt that the child should be put in prison first, and then the 12 of them went to the district prosecutor's office to explain the reasoning results and possible facts, and then let the child out of prison after finding the real murderer. After that, 11 people other than him started to have no time to do this for various reasons, even if they wanted to, they were powerless. Finally, one person concluded that we have fulfilled our jury duty, and it is not our responsibility to take care of the future. The person who finally concluded said that forty years later, our debate continues, but has everything changed? Like these old plumbing of the new school next to this courthouse, the debate is always there, but how many people are going to change? Law is above order, but what if mercy is above law Now, the child may have been subjected to countless domestic violence by his family, usually he is pitiful and innocent, and in that kind of stepfather and stepmother's family, perhaps after the mother and father go to work, the stepfather and stepmother hurt him even more. The adopted child may also be, not a blood relationship but maintaining a family relationship. The tension and hypocritical family relationship that is always guarded makes the child unable to control his emotions. He can only smile to everyone who has been educated. Once the collapse is a tragedy? When everyone was ready to vote unanimously, a guilty vote came out, just because he felt that letting the child out of prison at this time might avenge the adoptive father, even if they all felt that the child was not the murderer, and the court would be because of them. If the case is re-investigated by acquittal, the child will not celebrate his release at this time. The person who actually murdered his adoptive father would kill the child, and the child may not be able to find those people. If we acquit the child, the child will be killed, those people don't care about the child's life or death, just gag his mouth, maybe in a few months, his body will be found in the sewer, this Things will be over. I feel that there has been attention to this verdict. Then he felt that the child should be put in prison first, and then the 12 of them went to the district prosecutor's office to explain the reasoning results and possible facts, and then let the child out of prison after finding the real murderer. After that, 11 people other than him started to have no time to do this for various reasons, even if they wanted to, they were powerless. Finally, one person concluded that we have fulfilled our jury duty, and it is not our responsibility to take care of the future. The person who finally concluded said that forty years later, our debate continues, but has everything changed? Like these old plumbing of the new school next to this courthouse, the debate is always there, but how many people are going to change? Law is above order, but what if mercy is above law Now, the child may have been subjected to countless domestic violence by his family, usually he is pitiful and innocent, and in that kind of stepfather and stepmother's family, perhaps after the mother and father go to work, the stepfather and stepmother hurt him even more. The adopted child may also be, not a blood relationship but maintaining a family relationship. The tension and hypocritical family relationship that is always guarded makes the child unable to control his emotions. He can only smile to everyone who has been educated. Once the collapse is a tragedy? When everyone was ready to vote unanimously, a guilty vote came out, just because he felt that letting the child out of prison at this time might avenge the adoptive father, even if they all felt that the child was not the murderer, and the court would be because of them. If the case is re-investigated by acquittal, the child will not celebrate his release at this time. The person who actually murdered his adoptive father would kill the child, and the child may not be able to find those people. If we acquit the child, the child will be killed, those people don't care about the child's life or death, just gag his mouth, maybe in a few months, his body will be found in the sewer, this Things will be over. I feel that there has been attention to this verdict. Then he felt that the child should be put in prison first, and then the 12 of them went to the district prosecutor's office to explain the reasoning results and possible facts, and then let the child out of prison after finding the real murderer. After that, 11 people other than him started to have no time to do this for various reasons, even if they wanted to, they were powerless. Finally, one person concluded that we have fulfilled our jury duty, and it is not our responsibility to take care of the future. The person who finally concluded said that forty years later, our debate continues, but has everything changed? Like these old plumbing of the new school next to this courthouse, the debate is always there, but how many people are going to change? Law is above order, but what if mercy is above law Children may not be able to find those people. If we acquit the child, the child will be killed, those people don't care about the child's life or death, just gag his mouth, maybe in a few months, his body will be found in the sewer, this Things will be over. I feel that there has been attention to this verdict. Then he felt that the child should be put in prison first, and then the 12 of them went to the district prosecutor's office to explain the reasoning results and possible facts, and then let the child out of prison after finding the real murderer. After that, 11 people other than him started to have no time to do this for various reasons, even if they wanted to, they were powerless. Finally, one person concluded that we have fulfilled our jury duty, and it is not our responsibility to take care of the future. The person who finally concluded said that forty years later, our debate continues, but has everything changed? Like these old plumbing of the new school next to this courthouse, the debate is always there, but how many people are going to change? Law is above order, but what if mercy is above law Children may not be able to find those people. If we acquit the child, the child will be killed, those people don't care about the child's life or death, just gag his mouth, maybe in a few months, his body will be found in the sewer, this Things will be over. I feel that there has been attention to this verdict. Then he felt that the child should be put in prison first, and then the 12 of them went to the district prosecutor's office to explain the reasoning results and possible facts, and then let the child out of prison after finding the real murderer. After that, 11 people other than him started to have no time to do this for various reasons, even if they wanted to, they were powerless. Finally, one person concluded that we have fulfilled our jury duty, and it is not our responsibility to take care of the future. The person who finally concluded said that forty years later, our debate continues, but has everything changed? Like these old plumbing of the new school next to this courthouse, the debate is always there, but how many people are going to change? Law is above order, but what if mercy is above law
View more about 12 reviews
