Whenever I talk about movies, it’s Woody Allen, David Fincher, Stephen King, Frank Drapery, and Chad Linklater. I always ignore the Disney who grew up with me. From Little Red Riding Hood to Cinderella to Princess and the Pea and Rapunzel, every story can be recalled for more than 20 years. This is the charm of Disney. Fairy tales come first, reality behind, idealism and realism are used to show ideals and real life. Although the plot in the second half is a bit fragmented, it is exactly what the film intends to convey-this is'life', isn't it? ——A bottle of five flavors, it's unclear and unclear. Otherwise can it be called life? Those spectators who are trying to find profound sermons in the second half of the film should forget it. Why do we have to expect reason? Just like Ipsen’s plot, realism is everywhere, exposing the ugly side of family, law, and religion. , And always only talk about symptoms, but there is no cure, because he knows that the truth and methods are moving and changing from the longitudinal or cross-section. The policy can be used in another era. See the reality clearly, choose for yourself~ Maybe this is the real life described by Disney, which makes people who were immersed in the fairy tale world last second to anger and surprise.
In addition, I don't know that Rob Marshall was the director of Memoirs of Geisha without going back to the source, and that "Cinderella"-Anna Kendrick, whom I didn't like at first glance, also appeared in "In the Clouds". A good movie does not have actors that I can remember, and actors who can only remember the movie without being able to remember the movie.
View more about
Into the Woods reviews
