editing 5 points
It has been a long time since I saw such a lively and dripping editing. Every shot has a firm eye and secretes adrenaline.
Action design 5 points
Invincible action design, need to say more?
A 3.5 for photography
is somewhere between good and fair. Although Peter's kung fu is there, to be honest, it's not very good. However, it is not something that ordinary people can do to fully and wonderfully present the content in STORYBOARD, and the visual effects of this film are excellent.
The performance of 3 points
Clive Owen is not brilliant, which is disappointing.
Paul Giamatti didn't like wine and changed it to a cat with a gun (P WORD), it was a failure, where did your acting skills go? !
Monica Bellucci is a super invincible large vase. In this one, your performance may not be as good as "Four Hundred Years", which is too cautious.
1 point for the story
is the lowest point. Does this movie have a story? It's really 2, if it doesn't have the above highlights, I will not hesitate to throw it in the trash. Entertainment films are not like this. The story of "Die Hard" is very good, and all the event settings affect people's hearts, but what about SEU? There is absolutely no danger to the characters at all, and I really want to turn them off when I see half of them. This kind of story deceives kids who listen to heavy metal every day (such as the old version of the X-ring) that is okay.
Although some character details and jokes are still excellent, but... I want to say that these can't hide the fact that this film has no story. I want to say director, can't you tell me an interesting story?
I really don't want to say anything, such an excellent action design and editing coupled with a SB story is really a waste of TMD. I originally saw that everyone's reputation was so good. I thought this film would find a balance between the story and the action. It seems that I was wrong. This film is a comic-style work that is pure fighting and pure killing. I was expecting a comedy version of LEON or something, it seems I was totally wrong, I was really disappointed, I didn't get anything but fights.
Film is an audio-visual art, and it is based on the conflict of story and drama. A good movie will attract audiences through stories and audio-visual language. This is a constant standard through the ages. It is not proposed by me, nor is it proposed by a certain school or individual. This is a consensus. The story 2 of this film has violated my bottom line. I really cannot tolerate the existence of such a story, even I can write such a story.
If you say it's CULT, I can't do anything about it, but it's too awesome for CULT to be like this.
U KNOW WHAT I HATE? I HATE THOSE MOVIE WITHOUT A STORY! I
originally
wanted to give it a 2 because I wanted to beat the director (mainly because of the story), but I especially liked the director's imagination and the smoothness of the film. Edit, plus give PETER a face, 3 points, no more.
I am too kind.
View more about Shoot 'Em Up reviews