How could it be possible to make such a cast like this? It's a pity. The film keeps giving me the illusion that it could have been better, but what actually ends up in front of me is a waterless effect. After seeing the movie adapted from the original novel, I understand where the sense of disobedience during the viewing process comes from. This movie is like the director has drawn a row of vertical grids, and divided the content of the novel into several sections such as the protagonist's growth background, lewd priest, highway killer, corrupt sheriff, etc., filling in the content one by one, not caring about adjustment. (Or not adjusted properly) the length and depth of each plate, so that after 45 minutes of long foreshadowing, the Dutch brother gave a calm appearance, and the growing part was not very well shot, but it was dizzying I was drowsy, and when I saw Tom appear, I even had a sense of anticipation of "finally appearing, will it be more interesting next time". The depth is not up to standard. Next, the priest forced his sister to death, and the serial killer and the corrupt sheriff avenged his sister. As far as the plot is concerned, it should have been intertwined, but the climax and character conflict in it did not give any People are very impressed. Many plot arrangements seem to want to explore in-depth social issues, but the effect is greatly reduced because of the director's skill. There are also other plots, such as the fanatic priest played by "Cousin Harry" who was killed by a serial killer, stitched together in different stages of the story, making people frown. The whole movie is like a running account that uses gorgeous rhetoric to cover up his writing flaws. Rhetoric is this group of actors whose acting skills are mostly online. I can see that it is very hard, and I can see that everyone wants to shoot well, but the director has decided on the upper limit.
As for Netflix's description of "Telling about the trauma of the American post-war period in the 1960s", this is a good idea, and I can see that I want to rely on this, but it is too bad. The director messed around with what he thought was awards season elements, Vietnam War, religion, women, etc., and the stitched effect was not good.
It is tasteless to eat, and it is a pity to abandon it. Yan Gou weeps, in order to watch beautiful people, endure unbeautiful movies, is this in the Joan of Arc River?
View more about The Devil All the Time reviews
