to invest in a blockbuster of 300 million yuan. There are also many online reviews. But I think this film is very, very bad, its plot design is completely unconvincing, and such a bad plot is not enough for people to discuss human nature.
The beginning of the plot is that Li (sorry, I can't remember the character's name in the film) crawled out of the dead pile, followed a woman wretchedly for a while, and then the woman took Li into the room and gave him a bowl of porridge. Li, Li can tell the whole story of what he has just experienced (this is a general's palace?) and then two people can have that happen? It's completely incredible, even a prostitute should look at people, and don't just do it with random people, right?
Later, it was added that this woman was a "skinny horse", and she was very proud of it. General comments said that because she was a "skinny horse", this woman was not the same as Erhu. OK, I agree with this statement, then she should be particular about her image, and her behavior should be elegant. Even if the conditions do not allow it, she can't meet people all day long, right? The contrast between Xu's makeup and voice was too great, to an unacceptable level.
The same is true for the soldiers who siege the city. Even if the battle situation is tense (will the siege battle for 9 months be always tense? If it is tense, how long will 1,500 people fight?) It is understandable that they are unkempt, but they should not always be smudged on their faces. In mud?
The so-called war scenes are completely child's play (if it is a war movie with an enjoyable nature, I can accept it, but this movie wants to go the realistic route), what is the concept of the foreign gun team during the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom? It should be a small number of very valuable military services, and there is no protection from other military services. War is a competition of human intelligence, how can it be so childish? Modern directors should read more history books, learn about the real war, and then shoot war scenes.
What took the war to the extreme was Liu Qu's assassination of the leader of the Taiping Army. The leader who defended the city for 9 months turned out to be such a person. In the end, he ended the war by almost committing suicide. Become the leader of the Taiping Army? How did you guard the city for 9 months? It is not surprising that such a person becomes the emperor. The emperor did not rise up by virtue of military merit, not by his wrist, nor by intrigue. And the leader of the Taiping Army should be.
In the scene where Erhu assassinates the leader of the Taiping Army, there is another very unreasonable point. Everyone stood firm, but it was unbelievable that after Erhu took out his sword, he hugged the leader and poured it into the pool behind him? is it possible? This is probably a compromise of authenticity to the language of the lens, the problem is that the language of the lens here is not excellent. (To be honest, the language of most of the shots in this film is still excellent)
Then it is "killing and surrendering", all the guarding officers and soldiers are tricked in (must be tricked in, not driven in, as can be seen from the plot ) Wengcheng, where is Wengcheng? Those officers and soldiers are all pigs without heads? All were deceived into the Wengcheng, no one doubted? No backstroke? Children's play, completely children's play.
Then there is Liu Tianwang's sad performance. I can believe that Liu Yan's Erhu believes in "righteousness" very much and is unwilling to kill and surrender, but this is a rational judgment. It is impossible for him to have such a sad performance, because he must have seen himself The soldier was killed by the people in the city, and it is impossible for him to make such a move with just the word "righteousness".
Finally, the third brother found out that the eldest brother was going to kill the second brother. He did not discourage the eldest brother, nor informed the second brother, but killed the second sister-in-law, which was completely inexplicable.
What the second sister-in-law said before she was killed was inexplicable enough, roughly saying, "I want to hang red gauze this year and green gauze next year." The rape of the person who was killed is a reasonable response.
I found so many flaws. Those trenches were deep, and the bandits used a difficult "tight wire" kung fu to transport food and officers and soldiers took dangerous roads. . . . Not to mention these!
View more about The Warlords reviews
