The problem is that the stunned robbery succeeded, as expected, it was successfully planted, and it was logically betrayed by a big-mouthed companion, and then helplessly pulled into the final killing, and finally it was reasonable, unexpected. Is the one killed? Then the story ends? ? ?
It's too much to my expectation. How about a good turn of events? Well, you're not Gary, and you didn't say that it will end unexpectedly. But this is too dramatic, right?
In addition, the waste wood killer who pulled in from the outside of Peter's festival was like an innocuous polyp. As soon as I looked at him, I expected this to be a guy who didn’t succeed and was more than a failure (because Pete could do it himself, his reason for pulling in a killer who had nothing to do with this matter was too reluctant), I didn’t expect it, and it turned out to be a guy in the end. There is not enough success, but there is no supporting role for failure.
Arranging this character is completely meaningless to the development of the storyline! (Maybe it’s helpful for the director to express the economic downturn in the United States, even if it’s not easy to be a killer)
I’ve always guessed right before, and then in the end, I always thought that when Pete tried to kill the protagonist, this was a waste. Killer Chai will do bad things, and then Pete will be in vain and even be pushed back. As a result, the killing ended peacefully. What's so interesting about this story? Change the name to talk about the daily life of the gang.
View more about Killing Them Softly reviews
