Yes, it has both eye-catching footage and thought-provoking questions, which is not bad. But I think there are a few problems.
1. The murderer was angry and decided to take revenge because his father's suicide video was hyped (eating human blood steamed buns) and slaughtered those who ate his father's blood steamed buns. But here's the problem: what does the killer's eyed detective have to do with the nearly-killed heroine? Blame them for inaction? Is this too stubborn? Why do you think the female lead's department can stop all these kinds of incidents? This is too rascal.
But the problem is that you use this matter as the reason for your murder. In this movie, the reason is a little weak. Because those who spread the video about your father's suicide are just eating human blood and steamed buns, and have nothing to do with your father's death. What hurts is you and your father's relatives, and they do these things because they hurt your feelings. This is not ideal. I personally think that if it was changed to your father, of course he was going to jump off the building. When he was hesitating, the people around him encouraged him to jump off the building. In this way, those people are actually directly related to killing your father, but they are not traditional murders, and they encourage others to commit suicide. In this way, the topicality is much stronger, and there is a lot of discussion about whether it is a crime to incite others to commit suicide. This is what I think is the first inadequacy.
2. What the murderer did just went against his original wish, or what I thought was his original wish: to improve or attack the indifference of the world, which likes to eat human blood and doesn't care about others at all. Regardless of whether the few people he killed deserved what they deserved, it just promoted and encouraged those who watched the fun and eat human blood and steamed buns, and there was no counterproductive effect? You make others like to watch the fun more like this, and it won't have any counterproductive effect? You just got revenge for killing a few people you thought should be dead. So I think it should be like this: I'm still going to kill the few people who eat human blood and steamed buns. However, during each live broadcast, I randomly select a few people in the live broadcast to kill them together, so that netizens know this rule. In this way, every time these netizens live broadcast, they know that although the probability is small, they may become the next victim. In this way, there is a more ingenious and more thought-provoking ability. Since you can ruthlessly kill those people who eat human blood buns, it is just right to sacrifice some people to do your perverted experiments.
View more about Untraceable reviews
