Yes, I think Huxley would have to slap the screenwriter to death if he was still alive. There is no doubt that the screenwriter is a stinky white left, and in the process of writing, he almost unreservedly projected all the white left characteristics of himself onto the protagonist JOHN:
1. Only shout the correct slogan, but do not act. He doesn't really care about people's freedom and equality. He shouts slogans just to incite people who are lower than him to rebel, while he hides in a safe place and chats with his lover.
2. While scolding the social moral depravity, enjoy all the pleasures provided by the society (promiscuity, drug addiction, and instigation of subordinates are all done).
3. The eternal white lotus. When something goes wrong, it's all the society's fault: "My original intention is not like this, I'm not wrong."
4. Although he is just a Luther in reality, he somehow feels superior to himself (JOHN in the play was just a little diaosi in the old world, but in the new world he is an Alpha, the screenwriter's self-psychological projection).
5. This layer is still the psychological projection of the screenwriter: because I have a noble mind, as long as I do something trivial, I can attract everyone's love, especially women. There is no reason for the heroine's love for JOHN in the play. What did he actually do to the heroine? It's just that when I took her off work, I deliberately took a stop and got off at another place. Then I talked about my past love experience, and the heroine was deeply fascinated by him, I: ? ? ?
For the time being, I will write so much first, and I will add more when I think of new ones.
View more about Brave New World reviews
