Although the scene in the third part is bigger, what is the point of looking back at the big mazes in the first part? The world is like the end of the world. There is only one city left. There is definitely a shortage of labor, and it is a problem to maintain a living. It is also possible to make such a large-scale project to build a moving maze, just to let a few teenagers play parkour. Do you need such a complex high-tech maze just to get their serum? If the maze works, why don't you just throw these people back in the maze?
Like the Hunger Games, if the Maze Runner is set as a show for high-ranking officials and rich people to watch, it would be more reasonable in the past. After the young people escaped and knew the truth, they began to resist, and finally these show producers were locked in the maze, Reasonable ending.
The screenwriter himself can't tell the meaning of the maze. The latter two directly abandoned the setting of the maze, and made these young people into roast duck research serum. Why didn't you do this earlier? So the first one is a separate story, and the last two are separate stories.
View more about Maze Runner: The Death Cure reviews
