Calling a philosopher, I am afraid it is a bit inconsistent with the title. Except for the actualization of the trolley problem and the parachute problem in the opening, the latter has little to do with philosophy. This apocalyptic hypothesis is actually more biased towards anthropology and sociology, far from the purely logical game of philosophy. Although as an art worker, from the perspective of human history, it may not be wrong to kill the poet first. Because art is actually a derivative of the history of human civilization, it will not become extinct by killing the last artist. Because as long as it is human, even if you do not understand art at all, after time and life practice, art will still be produced in the remaining human beings. The art that was born at the beginning may be backward and inferior, but with the development, art will still rise. This is an incidental attribute of human beings. No matter whether the remaining people are willing or not, after time and production and life, art will inevitably prosper again.
On the contrary, according to Wang Dongyue's theory of progressive compensation, there is too much division of labor in society, so that people can only understand part of the production process, and the compensation is huge. It is the most difficult to restore the glory of human science and technology, so retaining scientists is Necessary, and they must leave documentation before they die. To prevent future generations from being lost. As long as productivity restores other soft things, it must be restored with it. This is the nature of human beings. Finally, it should be emphasized that the heroine is still very beautiful, and it is worth the teacher's toss.
View more about After the Dark reviews
