They say don't test human nature, but it's not accurate. The subtext is that human nature is evil. Human nature is complicated. In the film, there are not only the male protagonist, who is extremely cruel, but also the second actor who chooses to commit suicide in the face of shooting others to save his chance. Watching war movies from a young age actually has a mental journey. The earliest movie viewing experience of righteousness and evil is gone. Soldiers on both sides of the war, whether they kill or be killed, whether they are cruel, brave or cowardly, in life, is it not someone else’s or A son or a father or a husband or a lover? I'm afraid they are just ordinary people. It is not people themselves that distort and magnify human nature, but religion/politics/morality, the derivatives of human society from the semi-starved gathering stage to the more developed stage. Along this line of thinking, social progress will not solve this problem, only It will be more tragic because of the more developed technology and tools. From this point of view, Lao Tzu talked about this issue in the Tao Te Ching at an early stage of human civilization development more than 2,000 years ago, but the formula he prescribed was indeed a conservative way of thinking back to the time of the Duke of Zhou. So, is there a solution? "Fake Captain"
View more about The Captain reviews
