An obscure feminist target-"The Cramers"

Men are superior to women, how far or how close is it to us? Look at the obvious difference in the treatment of male and female movie stars. The pay of first-line actresses is usually less than half or even one-third of that of first-line male stars. In Hollywood, the base of the American Dream, a movie, a big-name actress, can earn a top 20 million yuan, and a male star can get 50 to 60 million—this is the case in the United States, which advocates the spirit of freedom and equality, all over the world. The unfairness of women's positioning can be imagined. Under such a premise, any film involving the relationship between the sexes, no matter what the coat of equality between men and women and sympathy for women, is still inherently put men above women, and it is everywhere that it is to defend men and be male-oriented. Mark of. Specific to this 80-year-old Little Golden Man movie, quoting Baidu’s comment: “The film also touches on a very sensitive issue in Western society: the issue of women’s liberation. In terms of the deeper meaning of the film, what is the director’s relationship between men and women? The issues of adjustment, how to achieve it, and how women should defend their independent personality and pursue meaning in life are discussed in depth. This is also the meaning of the film. "It seems that the director is a feminist who sympathizes with women. In fact, he filmed What is coming out of a movie? I try to use essential language as much as possible: A workaholic named Kramer has hunted down a beautiful and practical collection. He robbed her of her best eight years, deprived her of all her personal world, stifled her career and her dreams, and turned her from a smart and independent woman to an inferiority to collapsed housewife. When this collection finally woke up and rose and left for himself, he was furious and puzzled: I will give you food for you to wear. When I was most proud of it, you didn’t know how to come over to cheer and cheer, and even quit. , Stop serving Lao Tzu, do not do housework for Lao Tzu and raise children, you are still not a human being! It is not illegal to get divorced. He can only learn from scratch by himself and appreciate how difficult it is to take care of children and housework. In order to take care of his children, his career plummeted, from almost becoming a shareholder of the company to being swept away-in fact, any professional career elite with seemingly boundless beauty has lost the support and contribution of his partner, nothing! But who dare to admit that if it weren't for the yellow-faced woman in my family, I was just a shit? The same is true in this film. In order to beautify a pile of spiral feces into ice cream, a large number of tender scenes of father's love have appeared one after another. The middle section basically talks about how difficult it is for men to do business, but they can sacrifice everything for the sake of their children. Well, it turns out that the same thing can be sacrificed for the child, but not for the wife. Your damn early sacrifice a little bit to keep your wife, why should you sacrifice so much that you lose your job? The potential of the video here The line is actually: Women are born to support men, and men are all women when they fall so wrong. Why don't you support your men? See what you do to him! The audience will sympathize with this poor man! The keynote of the whole film is to establish a strong, enlightened and humanized male pig's foot. Later, it turned upside down and just one meaning: I love children! You left the child and ran away, so you might as well love the child as I do! In the end, just relying on this kind of neurotic obsession, he somehow defeated his wife after losing the lawsuit, making his wife willing to give up legal custody, and succeeded in plundering and destroying so many beautiful and precious things. , Once again took away the most important thing in her life: son!
The whole movie is actually showing favoritism and excuses from a male's point of view, using love for the child in exchange for the injustice to the wife. From beginning to end, the surnamed Ke has never repented of taking women as vassals. He only admitted that he had found the wrong person and had a wrong vision in choosing the collection. From directors to screenwriters, there is no intention to discuss whether such an attitude is right. They simply treat it as an objective phenomenon. Each person has his own way of living and choosing, and when they are together, they will disperse. That's it. In order to maintain the “surface depth”, the last part gave the supporting actress (I don’t think there are so-called female “main” roles in this film, and the status of women is a vassal in it) for a few minutes to state her feelings about her reasons in court . The original line of this passage is probably not painful, so that the actress is very dissatisfied, and she simply plays freely. (As a result, the actor is dissatisfied again and thinks she is stealing the limelight. Really: a woman who is a little better is to steal the limelight but to disrespect the man. !) Time is too short, she can only express two meanings: First, she is very painful and terrible about losing herself. Secondly, she believes that to be a good mother is to be a good mother, and to leave the child in a very bad situation is to treat the child better. The first thing she does after regaining herself is to retake the child. I think she spoke very clearly and thoroughly, and for very good reasons. The movie itself is vaguely inducing the audience: in any case, the behavior of abandoning the child is very irresponsible. But in fact, think about it from the perspective of a woman from the perspective of a mother. She is extremely disappointed with her husband. The child is the last hope in life. At this time, to leave resolutely, how much courage is needed to endure how much pain! If a mother who stays with her children day and night is in a mess, can she bring out happy and healthy children? Instead of letting the child follow the distortion, it is better to stand up again. How much wisdom is needed to make such a decision! Meryl Streep deserves the title of a genius actor. Her profound understanding of the role has made Mrs. Crew, who was a vassal a vassal, transformed from a one-sided, selfish women's liberation symbol for self-pursuit into a real flesh and blood. A great mother image of affection. It is a pity that she alone is unable to change the bias of the entire society, nor can she change the established intentions of the director and the screenwriter. Then, the man’s lawyer immediately gave an incomparable counterattack: your husband, personal qualities, do not drink or take drugs. Regardless of no bad habits, there is no infidelity; in family life, there is never abuse, and with a successful career, you can only support a life of worry-free food and clothing. What do you want to make trouble? At this time, the background should really be accompanied by Zhang Tianwang singing: If this is not love, I am so sad...Sure enough, men in a male-dominated society are not sad, even if The court sentenced the child to the mother; even if the mother earns more than the father; even if the mother is pregnant for ten months and has the child for five and a half years around the clock, it is the mother, and the father only takes one and a half years after work; even if it is the first material In the composition, the mother’s share of shares is actually far greater than 50%, even if the two people’s love for the child is really equal-but the director wants the woman to give up the child, and most viewers think this ending is very The warmth is very HAPPY, and the few who are dissatisfied think that they should be more complete, and simply let the two reconcile. I'm old, woman, your name is unlucky!
Final statement: I am a man, and I am ashamed and angry for the unfair treatment of men: It is too much advantage, and it gives me some face...

View more about Kramer vs. Kramer reviews