After reading it off and on, what I imagined in my mind was actually this: innocent children are on trial, parents are struggling, facts are gradually distorted, court debates are fierce, and parents do anything to protect their children. But after reading it, I found this: No one knows whether the child killed or not, but everyone except the parents and lawyers believe that the child killed the person. The TV series shows the vicious words of outsiders towards the family, the former relatives and friends are eager to distance themselves from the relationship, the media irresponsibly hype up the hot spots, the local prosecutor tried his best to try to convict, and gradually the pressure turned inward. Finally, he had a mental breakdown and decided that the child was the murderer and decided to commit suicide with the child. In fact, there are not so many reversals. The real major reversals are in the penultimate episode and the last episode. This drama does not take this reversal as a long, but chooses to use a very restrained method to tell this relatively heavy story well. The combination of photography, tone and soundtrack very successfully creates an atmosphere that is more heavy than suspenseful. In fact, I don't have a guess in my mind about who killed the child. I'm more willing to believe it wasn't Jacob, I hope not, after all, I'm still someone who likes happy endings. But as it has been revealed episode by episode, no parent really knows their child, and they are always looking at the tip of the iceberg, the size of which may surprise everyone below sea level. Most of the comments said that the original book and the TV series implied that Jacob was the real murderer. I didn't look at it with a microscope, and I didn't look very carefully, so I didn't participate in the discussion. In the end, my mother lost her mind and drove into a tree. I was quite fascinated by it, but she gradually believed that Jacob was the murderer, and the process of breaking down under pressure was always shown to the audience. As for the father, I would certainly not believe it if he consistently believed that his son was innocent. From the very beginning, when he found the knife, he dealt with it directly, and no one found the knife in the end. If you really are not afraid of anything, let the knife be checked by the appraisal department, and nothing will happen after that. . In the last episode, he insisted that his wife hit the tree as a rain accident and gave the audience a hint that no matter how much he doubts or knows the truth in his heart, he will choose the most favorable rhetoric when he speaks.
Michelle's work except this one I've only seen Gentlemen, the style is very different, and she does well in both works. As for the US team, although the roles from Marvel to "Genius Girl" to "Knives Out" and then "Defending Jacob" are different, in fact, except for "Knives Out", he plays all roles. One thing in common is that they all have a relatively perfect character. He is a villain in "Knives Out", but since the style of that movie may be unique, I really can't see whether he is acting so exaggerated on purpose or just to conform to the movie. itself. If he can really play a flawed person seriously, he can really show a different self.
View more about Defending Jacob reviews
