In fact, what I often don't understand is why so many people can regard Tarkovsky as a god but don't care about Antonioni. Of course, the two are completely two types of creators. And what I don't quite understand is that, in my opinion, except for ivan and solaris, most of Tarkovsky's films are nothing but acceptable to the public. Why do people who don't even understand bunuel think they themselves What about the spiritual exchange through Tarkovsky's films? Not to mention that Tarkovsky used a very "intellectual" in almost all films after solaris. I personally tend to think that although philosophy in movies often appears in the form of lines, it cannot be directly compared with discussions within the discipline of philosophy, because movies are a kind of artistic creation. The ultimate purpose of the film is art, which is not contradictory to the philosophical pursuit of art. For example, Tarkovsky is obviously too happy to express and think about these contents in the film, but the film also has philosophical concepts expressed through other art forms. In fact, it is a simplified point of view, a summary that abstracts the image into an ideology. Even if Tarkovsky expresses himself in his lines, he cannot directly use it as the philosophical expression of the film, otherwise why didn’t he write directly What about taking pictures of sewers and grass? Tarkovsky's shots are just too enviable, but it's true that watching his films doesn't really focus on shot scheduling. These are just some simple afterthoughts. We need to take a closer look at the nostalgia that I watched many years ago and the sacrifice of being drunk and laughing, in order to further understand the creative context and ideas of the tower. We know that if the fans of the tower can fall in love with the tower, then they must love Antonioni deeply, at least they will find Antonioni's extraordinary lens language and narrative style and creative angle, but this is not the case. But it doesn't matter. Of course, it is the best thing for such a film to have an audience and a market. In fact, it is sometimes strange that so many people like to watch Tarkovsky, so why did they cancel Bi Gan's Earth Night? Earth night is perfect and more watchable. It's the coolest fanfic movie I've ever seen. Tower, then they must be able to love Antonioni deeply, at least they will find Antonioni's extraordinary lens language and narrative style and creative angle, but this is not the case. But it doesn't matter. Of course, it is the best thing for such a film to have an audience and a market. In fact, it is sometimes strange that so many people like to watch Tarkovsky, so why did they cancel Bi Gan's Earth Night? Earth night is perfect and more watchable. It's the coolest fanfic movie I've ever seen. Tower, then they must be able to love Antonioni deeply, at least they will find Antonioni's extraordinary lens language and narrative style and creative angle, but this is not the case. But it doesn't matter. Of course, it is the best thing for such a film to have an audience and a market. In fact, it is sometimes strange that so many people like to watch Tarkovsky, so why did they cancel Bi Gan's Earth Night? Earth night is perfect and more watchable. It's the coolest fanfic movie I've ever seen.
View more about Stalker reviews
