The idea of the movie is great. Through Alex and Rosia's childhood sweethearts and their tortuous emotional experiences growing up, the topic of whether there is pure friendship between men and women is discussed. Some people say that the basis for a good friend between a man and a woman is "like". But I think this kind of question itself is one-sided. Humans have been constantly using a word to define the world, to facilitate communication and cognition. For example, three words to describe feelings: love, family and friendship. For example, first determine that a relationship is a friendship, and then use the code of conduct in the friendship to regulate the communication process. This is an efficient but also a lazy method, because the feelings between people are very complex, and various emotional entanglements are indistinguishable. And the development of feelings is not discrete, either friendship or love, so what about the intermediate form of evolution? That's why I like SHE's song "Above AUO, Not Full of Lovers", because it doesn't separate people's feelings, and realizes that feelings are never castles in the air. Recognizing that this makes more sense than answering the question above. High-end ideas and beautiful Lily can't hide the flaws of the film itself: exaggerated performances, lack of logic in the plot.
View more about Love, Rosie reviews
