The narrative at the beginning is fairly straightforward, and the plot is quite attractive. But soon the character began to be distorted.
The black person is the most vulnerable character in the film and the person most in need of help, but his words and deeds seem to be like a superior moral judge. As if the white lawyer owed him a lot of debts in his previous life. Not only can he not cash in the ultra-low $1,000 lawyer's fee, but he also put on the air of "do you want it or not?" Obviously you are asking for someone, but you keep showing others' faces. What kind of logic is this?
Faced with the charity money collected by the priest for him, the black people, even if they are conspiring and malicious, but why do you insist that they are conspiring without real evidence? In the end, the black man gave a threatening tone and asked the pastor to teach his family the full amount of the donation. What is this with what?
After the victory, the white lawyer excitedly said that we are a very strong team, but the black man gave him a face and said that I am in jail and you are outside. We are not a team. Oh my god, who on earth is asking who for help?
Another white rich and beautiful lawyer with a short-circuited head didn't know that the muscle was wrong, and kept sticking to the white lawyer. After being rejected repeatedly, she didn't give up. This completely reverses the true logic in real life.
This movie is a very typical pretender that caters to the bottom of society. Blacks pretend to be coercive to lawyers, and lawyers pretend to be coercive to beautiful women. The impoverished black workers, the Diaosi lawyer who thinks he is impoverished because of morality, act as heroes in the illusory dream of the movie. The speech and deeds of the characters in the film must be difficult to do in real life.
,
View more about A Time to Kill reviews
