from my rational level, Karl Lee is guilty of murder. According to the clear legal provisions and his actions, he should be found guilty. This does not need to be questioned, because no one can be above the law- -Although the law is not perfect;
but I continue to torture myself: What is the point of this? Because one of the functions of punishment is to punish the past and the future, so as to be effective. Which is more effective, guilty or innocence? My emotional level made me make a verdict of innocence. (But this premise is that the two criminal suspects have not been punished by law, and their expression in the movie is not perfect).
guilty? Not guilty? . . .
View more about A Time to Kill reviews
