If the dinosaurs hadn't gone extinct, this seemingly interesting hypothesis was interpreted as a very boring "human pet" growth drama. It's just that the talking "people" are dinosaurs, and the crawling "pets" are little apes. The film spends too much attention on the depiction of the authenticity of the scene, euphemistically called it is very realistic and uses the most advanced technology, but watching animation is really not watching this. We hope the little brontosaurus really did an amazing job when it put its footprints on the stone. But what is this amazing thing in fact, is it just to overcome the fear in your heart and go home from a far away place? In the film, dinosaurs seem to have a relatively developed agricultural civilization, and they know how to cultivate land, sow seeds, sprinkle water, and store food. Humans are still in the primitive civilization stage of searching for wild fruits and hunting. However, it is clear that the coexistence of dinosaurs and apes has not yet developed the hypothesis of "if the dinosaurs hadn't gone extinct" to the extreme, because we are more eager to know the latter thing, that is, how did humans survive on the earth dominated by dinosaurs , and how the dinosaurs faced the rapidly evolving human brain. A story that happened in the future is far more exciting than a story that happened in the past, because since the past has been subverted, why not subvert the future by the way? There are no diverse individuals of dinosaurs, no community of dinosaurs, only one or two families, five or six dinosaurs infested, is this the earth if the dinosaurs did not go extinct? For me, who wanted to see the big world of dinosaurs, watching a dinosaur-themed movie with only five brontosaurus and three Tyrannosaurus rex was really better than looking at the dinosaur toys on my bookcase. The biggest problem with the film is that the inevitability of the protagonist being a dinosaur and a small green brontosaurus is as unreliable as the hairspring of a kite. The ants in "A Bug's Life" are obviously more suitable for the proposition of growth, because for their petite bodies and at the bottom of the animal world's food chain, defeating any opponent is a huge challenge in growth. No matter how small the brontosaurus is, it is also a dinosaur. The film bluntly arranged some challenges from flying dragons for it, which is particularly awkward, not to mention that these challenges are full of death, bite, swallowing and other content that is not suitable for children to watch. As for the challenge from nature or its inner challenge, it is a stalk that can be used everywhere. The film also has a wonderful point, that is, the sensational scene of Thunder Dragon and Ape Man's parting. Leilong watched Diandian enter into a new family. It was also a family with two parents and two children. Diandian was also the youngest among them. All of this was very much like its own home. In its eyes, there is a little bit of reluctance, a little bit of blessing, and a little bit of envy. This mixed feelings makes the audience Thinking about it, on the one hand, I hope that Diandian and Leilong will continue their lifelong friendship, and on the other hand, I also hope that Diandian can find his own home. The dilemma finally led to the interaction of tears and emotions. In contrast, the film's description of his father's death is more rigid like a textbook, becoming a streamlined plot with little emotional content.
View more about The Good Dinosaur reviews
