The hint of the ending disappointed me

Teagan 2022-03-21 09:02:55

Seeing the ending, I really can't get a full score, so I finally returned to the rule of law in the United States? I don't think the doctor is flouting the law. The end's suggestion of refusing to discuss euthanasia at the legal level is very disappointing. Philosophy of Death analyzes that when a person is in severe, hopeless ailment and is alive, he can no longer contribute his life to society. The value is already negative and will remain negative until the day of natural death, then it is reasonable for the person to choose suicide. Although the author of the book said that the issue of euthanasia should be discussed separately, as long as suicide can be justified, I think euthanasia should be allowed. I don't think there is any rationale for those protesters to question the claim that doctors play God , ethics and other factors, it is up to me to decide, and God has no right to decide. Besides, if the doctor assisted suicide is to play the role of God to decide the death of others, then what are the roles of the courts that sentence people to death? Aren't they also a group of people deciding the life and death of another or a group of people? We really shouldn't give up the hope of life, but I still think that when a person is deep in the sea of ​​suffering and life has lost its value, he should have the right to decide his own life and death, and he should have the right to ask others to help him get out of the sea of ​​suffering Those who compare suicide by assisting someone who is in the depths of their pain and asking for relief, to kill someone in a wheelchair who is powerless to resist, they know nothing of that pain and despair, but stand on the moral high ground to condemn a man The kind doctor who compares euthanasia to genocide in front of an old Armenian man is unreasonable. The events and problems stated in the film are of social value. It's a pity that the ending comes with a hint of political correctness.

A gossip: This is the fourth Al Pacino movie I've seen, from "Hot Afternoon" to "Scent of a Woman" to "Scarface" and then today's "Doctor Death" Admire Al Pacino's interpretation.

View more about You Don't Know Jack reviews

Extended Reading
  • Kristina 2022-03-26 09:01:11

    Is this gray-haired old man really Al Pacino? I just watched "The Godfather Sequel" in the morning, but now I accidentally watched a movie played by the same person decades later. While I was convinced by the charm of the movie, I also sighed at the ruthlessness of the years. But drama bones are drama bones after all, I love you so much!

  • Josefa 2022-03-27 09:01:15

    If one day you were asked to face death, if one day you were asked to accept the dignified and independent end of your life from your loved ones, what would you think? How will you choose. Every time I watch the film, I will immerse myself in it, follow the plot, and watch it with tears. Maybe he is right, but he defiantly challenged the bottom line of human nature and attacked the rigidity of the law. This stubborn old man insisted on his beliefs, It's just that the arm can't twist the thigh and was beaten

You Don't Know Jack quotes

  • Lynn Mills: Have you no religion? Have you no God?

    Jack Kevorkian: Oh, I do, lady, I have a religion, his name is Bach. Johann Sebastian Bach. And at least my God isn't an invented one.

  • Dick Thompson: [Jack Kevorkian takes the stand, Thompson is the prosecutor] Can we all presume just for the hell of it that we are really in a courtroom, okay? That there is a judge and a jury and real witnesses?

    Jack Kevorkian: No, I will not presume. I refuse to presume.

    Dick Thompson: Can we presume that this is a real trial here?

    Jack Kevorkian: No, we can't. Because there's no law here. Am I wrong?

    Dick Thompson: You're wrong!

    Jack Kevorkian: Prove it. Cite to me one common law case of assisted suicide. One.

    Dick Thompson: I will ask the questions...

    Jack Kevorkian: Go ahead. I'm listening. We're all waiting.