I want to say two things
First, the action scenes. Fist to the flesh, flesh and blood, the best action violence photography of the year, the shootout in the fourth and fifth episodes really made me feel so cool, it should be difficult to see the shooting action scenes that surpass the London gangsters in the near future.
Second, the finale. The plot in the early stage is also quite compact, and there is no major problem, but the finale really made me stunned. Sean, the key point of the whole play, died so meaninglessly? Personally, I don't think there will be such a stupid screenwriter. After all, it is the character that the whole work focuses on. This should only be played by Elliot and Sean. In the end, Elliot took out Sean and gave some memory cards. It should be that Elliot entered the investors undercover and then joined forces with Sean's mother who didn't die in the ending to take revenge and resist.
As for whether Sean is dead or not, I don't think so. No screenwriter with brains will give up such a character that took a season to portray, and Sean is too embarrassed to die. He only blew up one building, and did nothing else. It has not been shown yet. Sean's personality charm. However, given that Sean's death is too real, and the frontal shot is still bleeding, it is very difficult to reasonably resurrect Sean in the second season, after all, the close-up is there. So, whether the screenwriter intends the immortals to play Sean's return, or the lack of brain circuits to give up Sean, we will wait and see in the second season. (If the second season just casually said Sean's fake death without giving a reasonable explanation, it would be a bad review)
In addition, Sean's younger brother, Billy, I always thought he was a ruthless character, and he should have superhuman performances in the later stage. He is not as simple as he looks.
View more about Gangs of London reviews
