What is the truth? Sometimes we believe it, and sometimes we doubt it. When the truth contradicts our perception, when someone is defending the truth. In fact, what we know and defend is what we believe. The truth didn't matter then, it mattered what you believed. If Jacob killed people, then I think, in a country where the law should be sound, it is necessary to tell stories to impress the jury and let them decide whether to stay or not? Moreover, the case was solved twice inexplicably. The murderer has endured what he should endure, but the method is very low-end, as if he has to attract attention and suspicion. Just by not admitting it, he escaped punishment (the punishment from his mother doesn't count), which made me witness the power of non-admittance once again. But the case is so speculated, the layers of doubts are unquestionable, and in the end, a group of so-called defenders is turned into a free person. It is indeed unbelievable, but even if Jacob did not receive the punishment he deserved, but His family and life can never go back to the past. From then on, there are only the past and the future. But if the people weren't killed by Jacob, then that's a little more complicated. All kinds of unfavorable factors point to him, and even the final verdict of innocence and freedom is so untenable. Everyone, all the evidence, all the downsides point to Jacob, just like Nick in Gone Love, neither of them have the slightest chance to resist in terms of two things, evidence, public opinion, etc. detrimental to them. And the truth is known only to those involved, because the reality is that even those who defend them are gradually becoming suspicious. The truth is there, it depends on whether you believe it or not, or which truth do you believe? Again or never the truth.
View more about Defending Jacob reviews
