"Peter Rabbit" is an adult-oriented cartoon through and through, just a live-action animation. The only one who treats the Peter Rabbit family friendly is Bey, the girl next door. Facing the death of his relatives and the loss of his home, Peter Rabbit launched an attack on Mr. McGregor and his nephew Thomas in an attempt to regain his home. The movie is full of metaphors, Peter Rabbit represents the bear child, and Bey represents the parent who protects the bear child. Of course, this is just an analogy, in fact, Bey and Peter Rabbit are not mother-son relationship. Peter Rabbit went to the vegetable garden to steal vegetables many times, and made a mess with the small animals in Thomas's house. Bay didn't stop Peter Rabbit, but told Thomas not to close the door of the vegetable garden. When Peter Rabbit destroys Bey's painting, Bey angrily drives Peter Rabbit away, even though Thomas blamed it on Peter Rabbit. It is equivalent to the destruction of the bear child. The parents do not criticize the bear child, but let the victim let the bear child. And when the bear child finally hurts himself, the parents will punish him. If you are not hurt, you will be indifferent; when you are hurt, you have to make the other party pay the price, which is too double standard. It is precisely because of such parents that such arrogant children are cultivated; the converse is still true, as there are arrogant children, there will be such parents. The reason why the bear child is mischievous is because he does not know the harm of mischief. This may be because the parents did not tell the child about the harm of mischief, or it may be that the parents did not punish the child after the child was mischievous, so that he would have a long memory, so that he would not be mischievous in the future. Many parents believe that cartoons are naive and young, and they must spread positive energy, promote the truth, the good and the beautiful, without bloody violence, and without evil. So, today's children have to watch "Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf" grow up. In fact, such as "Naruto", "One Piece" and "Conan", which parents think are not suitable for children to watch, are just really excellent cartoons. Of course, it is not right to let children see, because children do not have the ability to distinguish between good and evil, and more importantly, how parents teach. "Black Mirror" season 4, episode 2, the mother uses the "Ark Angel" program, which can selectively block the child's senses. Instead of educating her daughter about violence, sex, gambling, and drugs, the mother arbitrarily shuts off her daughter's senses, leaving her completely ignorant of these things. Even, the daughter does not even understand blood. So, in order to know what blood is, my daughter chose to self-mutilate... It is impossible for children to suddenly understand what violence, sex, gambling, drugs, etc. are at the age of 18. The more they do not show them, the more curious they are. Those so-called "children't suitable" things, It should be more education than prohibition, at least let the children know what it is, at least have the ability to distinguish. What parents should do should not be to completely forbid their children to understand, but to tell their children what is right and what is wrong. So in my opinion, the key is not whether a cartoon is suitable for children to watch, but whether parents can properly guide and educate their children. In "Peter Rabbit", Peter Rabbit is very black-bellied. He will use animal traps and nail rakes to deal with Thomas, hit Thomas' lower body with fruit, use dynamite to frame the blame on Thomas, and shock Thomas... Yang Yongxin can be called the rabbit world. . The plot and laughs of the movie are also more adult-oriented, and only adults can understand. Old McGregor ate Peter Rabbit's dad, Thomas tried to electrocute the little animals, and blew up the Peter Rabbit family, all of which meant that there was a dark core under the cute shell of this cartoon. Of course, whether it's dark or adult, it's just the style of the movie. If I have to say that this style is good or bad, I am more inclined to "good". Children who watch "Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf" every day will mistakenly think that the world is always beautiful and that the bad guys (Big Big Big Wolf) are mentally retarded and not scary at all. In "Peter Rabbit", Peter Rabbit held the bomb remote control and accidentally touched the button, which blew up the tree, not only destroyed his own family, but also destroyed Bey's paintings, which shows that the harm of mischief is very Big, dangerous things should not be touched, and if you are not careful, there will be serious consequences. Today's bear children scribble on places of interest, pour drinks on other people's pianos, scratch other people's cars... A large part of the reason is that parents are too spoiled. Bey mistakenly thought that Peter Rabbit had destroyed her painting and drove away Peter Rabbit; Bey mistakenly thought that Thomas had blown up the tree, so he broke up with Thomas. These are the costs of being wrong. It wouldn't have made things worse if Bey could treat everyone equally and compare Rabbit so harshly from the start. Regrettably, she has a double standard. When the interests of others are violated, she is indifferent; only when her own interests are violated can she act. How many children like Peter Rabbit are around us who are mischievous and think they are right; how many parents are like Bey who are mischievous and think it is the victim's fault: You are an adult, but he Just a kid, you should let him. So I understand Thomas's mood very well: yes, he's just a child, I shouldn't scold him, I should blow up his whole family with dynamite! It is worth noting that in real life, if someone else seizes your home and kills your relatives, you will be punished by law, and you can also call the police. But Peter Rabbit was robbed of his home and his relatives were killed. There was no complaint channel and no way to report the crime. More importantly, he could not reason with the old McGregor and Thomas, nor did he have the right to receive an education. If you don't take back the vegetable garden through violent means, you can only suffer a dumb loss. Just because Peter Rabbit thinks he is right, he will intensify his efforts and use more violent means to oppose Thomas. Gradually, it was swept away by anger, and it forgot its original intention. The purpose was no longer to take back its homeland, but to take back Bey. Thomas also grew angrier, initially just keeping the rabbits out before deciding to blow them up, largely at the mercy of Peter Rabbit. Peter Rabbit fights for home and Thomas fights back, but it doesn't solve the problem, it just makes things worse. The confrontation between Peter Rabbit and Thomas resulted in both losses, causing Peter Rabbit, Thomas, and Bey to fall apart. In the end, Peter Rabbit apologized to Bey, Thomas apologized to Bey, and they shook hands. It all started with hatred and anger and ended with tolerance and great love. When will the grievances be repaid, anger will only lead to greater anger, and they should live in harmony from the beginning. If Peter Rabbit is willing to endure the grievances, the situation will not be escalated, the life of the brother will not be in danger, and the family will not be conflicted. If Thomas cared about small animals, this man-rabbit war would not have happened. Letting go of hatred is harder than revenge, but it doesn't make things any worse. Narrow-mindedness, anger, and hatred cannot solve problems, but reconciliation, concession, and great love can solve problems. As Peter Rabbit's parents said: share love, never lose love. This is similar to the plot of "Three Billboards", where the protagonists hurt each other and lose both, and finally chose to reconcile. To the disintegration of Peter Rabbit, Thomas, and Bey. In the end, Peter Rabbit apologized to Bey, Thomas apologized to Bey, and they shook hands. It all started with hatred and anger and ended with tolerance and great love. When will the grievances be repaid, anger will only lead to greater anger, and they should live in harmony from the beginning. If Peter Rabbit is willing to endure the grievances, the situation will not be escalated, the life of the brother will not be in danger, and the family will not be conflicted. If Thomas cared about small animals, this man-rabbit war would not have happened. Letting go of hatred is harder than revenge, but it doesn't make things any worse. Narrow-mindedness, anger, and hatred cannot solve problems, but reconciliation, concession, and great love can solve problems. As Peter Rabbit's parents said: share love, never lose love. This is similar to the plot of "Three Billboards", where the protagonists hurt each other and lose both, and finally chose to reconcile. To the disintegration of Peter Rabbit, Thomas, and Bey. In the end, Peter Rabbit apologized to Bey, Thomas apologized to Bey, and they shook hands. It all started with hatred and anger and ended with tolerance and great love. When will the grievances be repaid, anger will only lead to greater anger, and they should live in harmony from the beginning. If Peter Rabbit is willing to endure the grievances, the situation will not be escalated, the life of the brother will not be in danger, and the family will not be conflicted. If Thomas cared about small animals, this man-rabbit war would not have happened. Letting go of hatred is harder than revenge, but it doesn't make things any worse. Narrow-mindedness, anger, and hatred cannot solve problems, but reconciliation, concession, and great love can solve problems. As Peter Rabbit's parents said: share love, never lose love. This is similar to the plot of "Three Billboards", where the protagonists hurt each other and lose both, and finally chose to reconcile.
View more about Peter Rabbit reviews
