At first I thought it was a comparison between the second female and the female one, but now it seems that the director probably wants to express not female liberation, but maybe against female liberation. What is shown is more of the damage to the child caused by the female lead's departure from home, but it avoids the neglect and injury of the male lead to both children and adults in the past five years. What's more, the warmth of the female lead over the past five years is not comparable to that of the male lead. A year later, he even said that the man is the real home of the child.
Use the warm father-son love as a shield to cover up the problems and conflicts that may arise between the father and son in the future, to cover up the mother's concern for the child. In the end, didn't the viewers basically fall to the male protagonist?
Indeed, this film does not have a female protagonist, only a male protagonist. Also used the Kramer couple as the movie name, ironic. sensational.
View more about Kramer vs. Kramer reviews
