The whole film is not about killing people, but explaining why they kill people, trying to make the audience understand and make the audience feel that killing can also be artistic. It can only be said that the more artistic it is, the more disgusted this film is.
I don't want to understand why he kills at all. Human instinct makes me not want to find art from killing the same species. Everyone's life is unique. Why use other people's lives to make art for you? The director himself is also a Nazi supporter. It is also suspected of "misogyny", and it is possible to make such an evil movie, and the foreign sky is also really "blue".
Most of the other serial killer movies have meanings of existence. On the one hand, the audience likes to be curious, exciting and terrifying. On the other hand, the psychology of serial killers can be dissected and analyzed.
But the existence of this movie is to let more people understand the killing? More people yearn for rotten art? In order to let more people lose their lives silently?
I have seen a lot of murderous movies before, such as "No One Survives". The killer is also a charming villain, and I think it is well done. But the reason why this film is hated by many people is that it attempts to glorify the word killing.
To be able to make such a film that challenges the bottom line of human relations, looking for art from torture and decay, even if one day it is revealed that the director of the film "Fon Trier" is a murderer in real life, I will not be surprised.
(Insert a joke: I don't think he looks like a good person...)
View more about The House That Jack Built reviews
