This movie missed a huge bug from the beginning. More than 30 years after the demise of mankind, the daughter raised by him looked so young, and Aunt Gong Li was dwarfed by it, and it was not until the mystery was revealed later that she knew what was going on (this is the director A particularly cheap place, with an obvious BUG appetite to seduce you to continue reading)
After watching the whole film, I deeply feel that robots understand themselves better than humans. Whether it is emotionally or in the game, I can also feel that every choice and decision made by a robot as a mother always contains rationality and sensibility.
As a robot, she tried three ways to raise new humans
The first way: stocking, let her be raised by humans in the last days, while it is responsible for observing. This is mother's first attempt, and it is also a good learning process. It is a very rational choice. After all, even if the robot has a huge database and rich knowledge reserves, sensibility is always a variable in front of science. And mother is also emotional. In her observation, when No. 1 faces hardships, mother will provide her timely help. We can say that this may be a means of prolonging observation and accumulating data, or it may be A performance that can't bear to observe the passing of the object like this. Of course, some people say that mother's performance is actually playing a big game, but from a rational point of view, he can use other methods to achieve his goals, so I prefer Yu mother has really been doting to protect No. 1 for more than 30 years.
The second way: Replicative parenting. In fact, according to the observation results of No. 1, the mother is in a practical state, just like us who became parents for the first time. If we become parents for the first time, we have no external information and objects as a reference. , then it is natural to lose control in the process of raising children. Judging from his 30-year-old state, No. 1 must have a miserable growth process, and mother will definitely fail, so in general, No. 2 is very It is possible that it was destroyed after failing the test. It is very likely that it was cremated after death. Judging from the size of the frontal bone, the child may not be an adult, and it is very likely that he died at the age of 12-14. of
The third way: reflective parenting. If there is a robot that can think for itself, I think it will be more profound than humans in the process of analyzing itself, reflecting and summarizing problems. The core is that robots don’t want “faces”, we In the process of reflecting on oneself, the problem will be attributed to others, and on a machine that is relatively rational than human beings, it does not need to do so, so with the observation object No. 1, there is a practical example No. 2, and No. 3 What happened above is not surprising at all.
So, why did she arrange for No. 1 to return to the base?
In fact, the fundamental reason is to eliminate "unstable factors". The variables of human beings are always perceptual, so perceptual can not guide? It's not impossible, but the core is, what value does this variable end up with? It's like a cat box, you can't determine it, so No. 1 was introduced into the laboratory for experimental confirmation, and from In the end, the sentence when mother went to find No. 1: "Do you really think she will live in this place with you?" In fact, it has been shown that mother understands human nature very well, at least better than human beings themselves, all of No. 1's self The arrangements are only for the sake of not being alone anymore, while mother takes advantage of her human nature to do the game. Under the circumstance that mother can completely monitor the activities of No. 1 and No. 3, why would it be unnecessary to throw a panic to deceive herself? Daughter, unless mother's purpose is to make No. 3 no longer trust herself.
Another manifestation of mother's deep understanding of human nature is: "where's others?" - in the case of fully understanding No. 1, she has been asking this question, in fact, it is nothing more than showing two things:
The appearance is that mother cares about human beings
And the deeper reason is that mother is constantly raising the hope of No. 3 through such problems, and this hope is not given by mother, but No. 1. The so-called climb higher, the more painful it is to fall , compared to that bullet, mother only needs one sentence, I want to protect my family. When the answer to No. 1 was revealed, my trust in No. 1 was infinitely approaching 0.
That's the genius of mother - it really understands humans better than humans - the camera is completely different from what humans see, and that's what it means.
And when mother finally wants to destroy No. 1, in fact, it has already occupied sensibility - the existence of No. 1 will be an unstable factor in the whole plan, no matter how reluctant it is, it needs to be erased
View more about I Am Mother reviews
