Starting from May 8th, I spent two days brushing the raw meat version. I thought I would wait for the subtitle version to be released and then give it a good review, but some people gave 1 or 2 stars without even finishing the drama. The sunspot really made me "Ten thousand?" I couldn't resist and wrote this Diss article.
Among all the reviews with 1 and 2 stars, they are roughly divided into three categories: "boring", "overwhelming negative energy", and "unreasonable logic", and several of them are extreme comparisons with R&M.
First of all, for people who feel "boring", I have thought about the reasons for a long time. Considering the evaluation time, to a large extent, I can't eat the raw meat version, so I just throw away the comments. I think my English level is not very high, but I am right. It was the plot, the pictures, and the belief that the "R&M" team would produce high-quality products that supported me after I finished eating the raw meat, which really lived up to my expectations. So, if you feel "boring", if you really disagree with English, can you wait patiently for the subtitle version to come out, and then speak objectively after reading it? I really don't care about you who are "boring".
In addition, those who give low scores because of the so-called "negative energy explosion", "blood" and "violence", please understand that this is the style of this creative team. The keynote of the whole animation is "I HATE EARTH", and Korvo's inner monologue will be repeated in the two minutes of each episode to remind you that you can't accept leaving early, and don't use one star to spoil peace. Hurt this animation and the hard work of the people who made these animations.
Among all the evaluations with low scores, people who evaluate boredom or negative energy can be understood as "the problem of each person's empathy and acceptance of value scales". The most unacceptable thing to me is the crazy logic people out there. What animation is most afraid of is the so-called logical self-consistency of the public.
You said that you think that alien species higher than humans should not go to school and should not please humans (in fact, it is not so-called pleasing), the setting of Doraemon is still from the future and has omnipotence. As for the treasure bag robot cat, it is many times more intelligent and advanced than humans. Does he need to eat or drink water? If he can't charge it, he doesn't even need to charge. However, this is not shown in the animation. Instead, they sleep, eat, drink, and play like ordinary humans. They will be happy, sad, and even in love. These so-called "self-contradictions" have not affected this cartoon becoming a classic in the eyes of millions of people, because the audience's focus is not on these. Are all fools unable to see these simple logical problems?
People who take "going to school" as a point of arrogance are indeed only worthy of watching Pleasant Goat. It is easy to understand and can achieve a lot of logical "self-consistency". You need a narration to tell you what the big truth is in each episode. . First, why can't higher alien species receive human education, can't you allow others to experience the life of "lower creatures" as a pleasure? Can aliens have emotions? This indisputable "I don't want you to think, I want me to think" is full of arrogance, prejudice, and no brains. Secondly, you said that your setting is contrary to your behavior. Isn't this behavior a setting given by the author? I just want to let aliens "go to school", that is, let them get along with humans, so some Do people really understand the author's setting of aliens, and have they thought about the real intention of the author's "intentional" setting? Is it meant to be sarcastic or to express something else, is this "intentional" really illogical?
As a commonplace topic of bullying and racism, campuses are the most prominent places. In the first episode, the alien siblings were discriminated against by humans, thinking that they were aliens and out of tune with the campus. The irony is that those racists, even in the face of higher creatures, do not forget to show their arrogance and rudeness, and try to shake the tree. These techniques "R&M" are exactly the same. I won't repeat the core of what I want to express in every episode that follows, "sexism", "power struggle", "human selfishness and greed", if you think about it a little bit, you can understand that this is by no means a superficial story, it's just An animation to satisfy people's curiosity.
Therefore, please give the very low score of the brainless Heizi moving the Pleasant Goat and the bear haunt these animations, swipe it 100 times, and then comprehend the truth of this animation. Finally, I object to the extreme comparison between R&M and this animation with a "fan-only" mentality. They are both born by the same parents, and they are both excellent works. Why should this film bear such a heavy burden of "being compared" Responsibility, should we treat it differently? Those who understand will naturally understand the painstaking efforts of the author, and will naturally understand what the creator is thinking.
View more about Solar Opposites reviews
