The positions are different, but the essence is captive behavior to satisfy "selfish desires"

Mossie 2022-03-22 09:02:11

I watched people crazy Amway on Weibo. After watching it, I felt that there was something. The whole documentary focuses on the mediation of Joe and animal protectionist Carol. Joe seems to represent the evil side, but Carol’s animal protection career is also from From the beginning of the purchase, what they do is essentially the same, it’s just a different narrative position. Carol is better at using the moral high ground to influence and inspire more people to stand on her side. In the reversal of the news, the film has an in-depth analysis of human nature. At first, each of them raised tigers because of their interest, but gradually they developed their interest into a business model to make money to feed their interest. The desire is getting bigger and bigger, and there are more and more animals in captivity. Everyone has their own crimes. Joe is the craziest of them all. He is arrogant and eager to be famous, but I can't hate him. On the contrary, I can feel the charm in him. Halo. And although Carol wears the halo of an animal protector, she also keeps animals in captivity for the rest of her life, and the situation of animals has not improved. In my opinion, she is a hypocrite. But she did one good thing, and she successfully pushed for legislation to ban wild animals in captivity, and it eventually passed. Wild animals do not belong to cages at all, and the captive behavior of all lovers is actually just to satisfy their own selfish desires.

View more about Tiger King reviews

Related Articles