David Lynch, not David Fincher. This movie made me distinguish the two and at the same time made me feel that the western film industry is full of talents.....Want to make a brain-burning movie? Just add a little dream. . . . .
Although the filming method of this film is similar to that of David Lynch in the past, it is more intense and complex: A watched the film made by B, and the film was adapted from the real life of C. When A was watching the movie, he felt the same way, so much so that he became obsessed. So the reality and dreams of the three women, the real and the unreal are intertwined - this is an explanation that I think is quite appropriate (a bit of the temperament of Inception) Of course, you can also regard it as a woman's dream, but There's no point in discussing the plot because I don't want to interpret the dream. After all, the director shot without a script, and every scene was improvised.
Therefore, unlike other brain-burning movies, there is a realistic logic that you can more or less deduce. Here, it is impossible to distinguish between reality and fantasy. The first time I watched it intermittently five or six times, I gave up after seeing half of it. . It took me over a year to watch it patiently (it's the most obscure movie I've ever seen anyway). Watching this kind of brain-burning movie is like doing a math problem, and after watching it, you can answer the answer with others. The director gave you many scenes, but we spelled out more than one story. Finally, remember, don't watch it at night. (This is the scariest movie I've ever seen - fear from the depths of the soul)
View more about Inland Empire reviews
