Fake feminism - "Charlie's Angels 2019"

Virgie 2022-03-24 09:02:40

Fake feminism - "Charlie's Angels 2019"

Today, let's talk about the movie "Charlie's Angels 2019".

The film title Charlie's Angels (2019), alias Charlie's Angels / New Charlie's Angels / Charlie's Angels / Detective Qiaojiao (Hong Kong).

As we all know, the IP "Charlie's Angels" comes from the American drama of the same name in the 1970s. In the play, three gorgeous female agents complete various tasks, and accompanied by a large number of fragrant scenes, they have become a beautiful landscape in everyone's mind. The show was so popular that it was filmed for five seasons. "Charlie's Angels", which was filmed in 2000, became a stimulant for the theater and became a hot topic of discussion.

In 2019, many remakes were launched, and the restart of old IPs such as "Men in Black: Global Pursuit" and "Charlie's Angels 2019" shows that on the one hand, the producers have misestimated the influence of the old IPs, and on the other hand, it shows that Hollywood's creativity has declined.

The old version of "Charlie's Angels" won the audience's attention with its excellent action choreography and beautiful pictures. The success of the film is due to the factors of the right time and place, as well as the reasons for its outstanding quality. The combination of the two contributed to the popularity of this series.

After nearly 20 years, I still want to remake this series, and I can only say: "Sir, times have changed."

From the content to the form, from the public opinion environment to the background of the times, the film cannot reproduce the scene of the year. At the beginning of the release of "Charlie's Angels 2019", I was not optimistic about the film, and both the word of mouth and the box office proved that my guess was correct.

If I were to rate this film, 1 for Naomi Scott's beauty, 1 for Kristen Stewart's beauty, 1 for Professor X's Patrick Stewart, 3 out of 10.

The film wanted to make money under the banner of feminism, but knocked men to the ground with female fists, which not only did not please the female audience, but also drove away the male audience.

One can't help but wonder, how can such a good thing happen?

The plot in the film is to fool the audience at all, and it is impossible to see how much effort the screenwriter has put into arranging the plot. The form is even more messed up. The old Charlie's Angels move fiercely and fiercely. When they fight, they are not sloppy at all, and they will not give people a feeling of contrived. But when I saw the action scenes in "Charlie's Angels 2019", I would hear Chen Huilin's "It's Better to Dance":

rather than dancing,

It's better to dance than fight,

make the audience feel uncomfortable.

Charlie's Angels' talent.

In addition, the same problem with the film is that it is extremely "Hollywood political correctness".

The film replaced Asians with black and Middle Eastern actors. Originally, Lucy Liu could make the film appear uncompromisingly diverse, but now, Asians can only play villains who are two-faced and three-dimensional, and only white and black people can save the world. .

Anyway, Liu Yuling performed well in "The Sherlock Holmes Method" and "The Deadly Woman", and "The Sherlock Holmes Method" is the right political correctness.

The following three jokes are still appropriate in this film:

On the American bus, an American asked another person: Are you transgender?

The man replied: I am not.

The American gave him a slap: Then you fucking stepped on my foot.

The man was aggrieved: shouldn't you then ask me if I'm gay?

The American replied: Go away, I just realized that you are Asian.

The United States holds a racial equality gathering. The host asked: Those who think American society is full of discrimination, please sit on the left, and those who think American society is very equal, please sit on the right.

As a result, the vast majority of Americans sat on the right, and a small percentage of Americans sat on the left. Only one American sat in the middle.

The host is very strange: why don't you choose.

The man replied: I think America is mostly equal, but I am still discriminated against in my life.

The host saw his face clearly and quickly said, Asians, get out of here.

An Asian fell into the water and called for help, and an American policeman smiled and passed by him, turning a blind eye.

Seeing that he was about to drown, Asians had an idea and shouted: Black violent race, burn gays, Muslim terrorists!

The police turned pale when they heard it, and immediately took out the pistol and fired a box of bullets at the Asian, and then he was relieved.

Blindly frying cold rice fake feminism,

Political correctness really makes money.

This is the distribution center for hardcore movie fans, welcome to pay attention to the public number: Miaokan Film and Television

View more about Charlie's Angels reviews

Extended Reading
  • Salvador 2022-03-27 09:01:13

    It is expected that the literary drama is bad. I didn't expect the action drama to be a mess, and there is no point to watch. It is definitely the most unbearable IMAX experience this year. PS: 1. Michael Keaton is Batman, Ben Affleck is Batman, and "Silly Na"'s ex-boyfriend is also Batman. 2. Send express, with parcels. 3. The anti-two gods are similar to the T-1000, but unfortunately the combat power is not good. 4. EMP has become the new favorite of Hollywood screenwriters, playing from Terminator to Charlie's Angels this month.

  • Joanie 2022-04-24 07:01:16

    Really hit the street. I suspect that the director doesn't know how to edit at all, and the cutscenes made me happy too. The girlspower silhouette at the beginning is really embarrassing. If you want to talk about feminism, you can't do shit like this, and you just put the affirmative label on the audience's face. Are you really afraid that everyone is a dick cancer? I originally watched this for the luxury and naomi of the OST lineup. I didn't expect that the whole film really counted on listening to songs and watching the female cast's face and figure. Seriously, isn't this a Victoria's Secret show with a plot? The performance of naomi's performance is also too bad, it can't compare to the amazing performance of Princess Jasmine before. What I think is very sick is the part where the director plays with this bat terrier. How many of Michael Keaton's best Batman theories, really want to smoke her, too old to laugh, tacky, embarrassed and still forcing use. The choreography of the fight is also completely unacceptable, the popcorn is not on the line, and the tribute is also made like this, the plot is full of loopholes and the lines are too embarrassing, demonizing men to achieve the goal of equal rights, such a forced feminism really makes people feel Unacceptable vomiting.

Charlie's Angels quotes

  • Jonny Smith: [after everything she put him through] Wanna run away with me?

    Sabina Wilson: God, you are so desperate!

  • Jane Kano: We probably shouldn't get caught standing over a dead body.

    Sabina Wilson: [dirty after fight] Not dressed like this, no.