At first, it was actually attracted by the title of cat abuse, but I didn't expect it to become such a serious incident later. Netflix's documentary is very well shot, and the background music and camera changes are full of suspense, which makes people unable to watch it in one breath. For people like me who don't know about this matter, it's really conscience to explain it clearly and progressively without any bloody scenes. A lot of times I cover my eyes for fear of bloody images, so I let go hhhh. Personally, I think it may be better to tell more from Luca's side, and the analysis of psychological motivation will be more full. However, the title said that the focus is on tracking, so it is completely plausible.
For the question at the end of the film, are we helping the tyrants? I think, the audience didn't, because the events were over by the time we watched, and Luca being in prison wouldn't have any effect. Even if you give him attention, what year? It is also said in the film that Luca wants attention but does not want to be arrested, so the current attention may not hinder his expectations. But the role of the tracker is really something to think about. This time the propaganda is because they have done what is generally considered right at the moral level. What about other things? There are so many people looking for other people's clues on the Internet, whether it is chasing stars or peeping at ex-girlfriends, are these worthy of praise? Will someone watch this documentary and learn some tricks that will cause trouble in other people's lives? From Luka's point of view, will it be the day-by-day search of the trackers, the clicks on his videos and pictures, the increased popularity that will satisfy Luka to pursue higher attention and accelerate the whole event Progress? Without these people, would Luka post a video that no one paid attention to and then stopped? Or how many years may it take for Luka's psychology to be so deformed that he wants to kill, but the netizens catalyzed his psychological development? None of this we know. But for the first victim, the man who died by suicide as a result of a human flesh search, I feel pretty sure that cyberstalking killed him. In daily life, it is definitely these people who are more affected by the Internet. It is impossible for anyone to be a perverted murderer. It is more likely that they are keyboard warriors who are simply hot on the Internet. Then we are really all To search for them in human flesh might lead to driving them to a dead end?
View more about Don't F**k with Cats: Hunting an Internet Killer reviews
