I suddenly remembered a point. When I watched "Never Give in" yesterday, I felt that it was a good film, especially based on the real background, but I always felt awkward, and I thought about it today. It may be due to the time limit and the choice of narrative weight. It is easy to attribute the change of the supporting characters to the sudden awakening influenced by the protagonist's arc. Take this female lawyer as an example, she has been defending the company, collecting so-called evidence, and standing in the obvious loss of rights. The opposite of the female miner, from the film, it looks like a "traitor" in the female ethnic group. The director may not stand up to such a simple treatment, so he arranged for the boss to humiliate the "female lawyer" in the office conversation, which is for the future. Abandoning refutation adds antecedents, but I think it should be better. As a lawyer, especially a female lawyer, she should stand on the opposite side to defend the perpetrator. This kind of defense can actually make the victim's testimony more rigorous. This kind of dialectical relationship, to jointly pursue the result is infinitely close to justice, but on the one hand, the film structure does not allow to increase the length of time to shape the characters in this way, on the other hand, most people do not believe in dialectics and despise these lawyers who defend the perpetrators. The presence of people like them in the depths of darkness brings out the light. This is where the awkwardness lies. I don’t really want to see why the big guy wakes up suddenly. It seems that the heroine wins too easily. However, the Hollywood classic writing sentence pattern cannot put everyone in the two hours when the human body is subjected to the limit of watching movies. are made into complex characters. So what do you think of this "uncomfortable"? A sentence I often hear is "art comes from life", but you should remember the other sentence "art comes from life". The movie here seems to open a window, and as a picture frame, it must be There are trade-offs, and as an audience, are you willing to see more things that are intentionally or unintentionally blocked through this window? Going back to this movie, we see that there are still people in modern society who suffer from unimaginable insecurities. Justice, then there must be more in reality, but the written law cannot protect anyone, and the freedom obtained by infringing on the freedom of others cannot be called equality, and there is absolutely no right to be obtained without standing up.
View more about North Country reviews
