The movie "The Door" made me understand that a person's greatness or downwards outstanding, excellent, outstanding, outstanding, not bad, depends on how much he/she leaves (creates) the eternal good things, whether it is material either mentally or informational.
From the point of view of the conservation of mass in physics, no one can leave anything behind. If the law of entropy increase is put aside, the sun does not send light to the earth, and meteorites do not hit the earth. The earth is an isolated system, a dead planet, and the earth is Nothing can be created. Even with the arrival of light and meteorites, life on earth is born and grows endlessly, but they are all repeated on the basis of the original material.
Your feces and urine irrigate the vegetables, some parts of the feces and urine become part of the vegetables, and eventually you eat them. Pigs ate a lot of cheap vegetables irrigated with excrement and urine. After the pig was slaughtered and eaten by you, it became a part of you after being digested. After you died, you were carried into a coffin and buried. , a part of you becomes a part of the mouse, and even the sperm that constitutes a male mouse comes from your flesh and blood, so you become a new-born mouse, and this little mouse is accidentally killed one day. A hungry sow is trampled to death and eaten, and the nutrients of the mouse just constitute the eggs of the sow, so you finally become a pig, and when you grow up, you are slaughtered by humans.
From this point of view, the Buddhist theory of reincarnation can indeed be explained, but I am against what pigs have cultivated for many lifetimes and have been a good pig in every life, and finally reincarnated as a human being in the reincarnation of the next life, and how many times a certain person He is a bad person all his life, so he was reborn as a pig in one lifetime. I firmly oppose this view that is the same as the Christian heaven theory, this kind of intangible, invisible, unverifiable and unfalsifiable thing, you just need it, because it does not bother your life, others Believe, let them believe, at least let them fear and do good. It's just that most people don't believe in this set of things anymore, so they do evil things without any scruples. There is no hell fire. In this life, let's enjoy the happiness and longevity first, and don't care about the floods of the younger generation. Confucianism and Mohism have a very interesting difference in the theory of ghosts and gods, but the ultimate purpose is the same. Confucians do not believe in the punishment of ghosts and gods, but they attach great importance to the rituals of sacrifice, and respect for ancestors and dead spirits is the only way to celebrate the Qingming Festival of our Chinese nation. In ancient times, it took three years to observe filial piety. The Mohists believed in the punishment of ghosts and gods, but despised sacrificial rituals, respected festivals and burials, and denied the waste of human resources such as three-year filial piety. In fact, it has indeed been overthrown in modern times. The biggest difference between Confucianism and Mohism is that Confucianism respects the king and Mohism respects the people. Therefore, Confucianism respects the father together with the biological mother, elders, and elder brothers because of the respect for the king. However, respecting requires energy and wealth, so it pays attention to thick, burial, and extravagant activities. Only when rituals and music are performed can they appear noble and conform to rituals. The Mohists respected the people and advocated "saving use", "feasting on burials", "not having fun", and "enduring hardships", so they wanted to bring the king to the same status as the commoners, and demanded that the king should be the same as the commoners. In fact, if you think about it with your butt, you will know that everyone likes to be flattered, and those in power prefer it, so the two schools of Confucianism and Moism, who were once attacked in the Qin Shihuang era, will be in the ascendance of Confucianism in the future, and Moism will quickly die out. Of course, this is also related to the fact that most of the Confucians came from the children of scholarly families, and most of the Moists came from the children of peasants. That is to say, it is related to the basic plan, and the maintenance direction is different. Even if the farmers are born and believe in Confucianism, what they think is (goods sellers and imperial families) to use the power of the king to build a scholarly family, and shade the descendants for generations. Of course, all this They are all supplemented (basic game), and their biggest goal is still the world. The Mohists never thought about their own selfishness. They only thought about the people. No matter how hard or tired they were, they were willing to die. Even if they died, they would "die without turning their heels." Great, more earth-shattering chivalrous spirit. Too much nonsense.
I give the example of pigs and mice to illustrate that it is impossible for human beings to create things. The so-called creation is to create something from nothing. It is almost impossible to create something from nothing, because it is also constrained by the law of conservation of mass and energy in physics. Given a mass of air, it is absolutely impossible for you to create a balloon out of thin air. So from nothing, this is God's business, it is the hypothesis of the mystery of the origin of the universe - the Big Bang, this is not our human business, we human beings can only transform things on the basis of things, which we call creation, Including all invisible spiritual thinking logic and other metaphysical things called information, such as thought, literature, music, programming language, etc., are all built on material, without material, they have nothing to rely on. When I say this, many materialists immediately applaud, but I am about to slap the rake. I want to say that without thinking and logic, it is impossible to transform things, pigs, mice and dogs, it is impossible to build a pile of snow. Snow pigs, snow mice, snow dogs and even snowmen, but people can build snowmen, snow pigs, snow mice and snow dogs. This is called creation.
Give a child a handful of mud, and he can squeeze a lot of things, including little mud pigs, but little pigs can't squeeze little mud figurines. Give you a pen, you can write and draw, write a letter to your distant lover, or draw a sketch of him/her to solve lovesickness. And give you a guitar, you can play the sound, but you may not be able to play a harmonious and beautiful sound. To play a harmonious and beautiful sound, you have to learn the knowledge of rhythm. The knowledge of rhythm, the intangible acoustic psychological and logical knowledge, is the product of the accumulation of human experience. It comes from the sounds made by various objects and the laws of these sounds. It is precisely when human beings have mastered these laws that they are manipulated. By organizing these sounds, music is born. Then human beings learned to save the music records before they can get the music scores, and future generations can restore and play the predecessors' music according to the music scores. Then human beings learned to save the music records, and then they have turntables, phonographs, CDs and amplifiers. Now, only a mobile computer and a pair of headphones can enjoy Beethoven's music two hundred years ago, and Beethoven left behind What you hear is just a music score, what you hear is an mp3 or other format song (media file) that was recorded by later generations to restore the performance (such as vinyl records) and then digitized (binary) and saved on the mobile computer. From vinyl records to media files is a creation (analog signal carrier to digital signal carrier), and from media files to your earphones to make the sound heard by you is another creation (digital signal carrier to analog signal carrier to restoration sound). Creation is everywhere in the human world, changing the living habits of human beings and making human life better. And whoever creates the greater quantity of eternal good, whether material or spiritual or informational, he/she can be called great. Down below are outstanding, excellent, excellent, outstanding, not bad.
And if a person makes a lot of money, is he/she (he will be used later) considered great? No, because according to the law of conservation of mass, the money in the world is made by the yarn printing machine. As long as human beings are willing, human beings can use all the substances on the earth to make money, and even shine the sun into the earth's sunlight and smash it into the earth. All meteorites are used to make money, but they are all limited, because the conversion rate of sunlight is almost zero. It is hard to imagine that someone would build a cauldron like the 500-meter-aperture spherical radio telescope in Guizhou to receive sunlight (light particles) to convert into matter. What humans often do is to build a dam to form a large pot to catch the rainwater from the sky for farmland irrigation or daily drinking water. And a meteorite has to wait for many years or even hundreds of thousands of years. Most meteorites have been burned into gas in the atmosphere, and it will take a long time for its dust to slowly land on the earth. And a person who takes all the money printed by the yarn printing machine and scrapes it into his own hands is equivalent to taking possession of all the oceans, rivers, lakes, lakes, ponds and wells on the earth, and not giving others a way to live. In fact, he himself can only Use a tiny little bit. I know there are many people who have this idea, but no one has ever actually done it, because the others will kill him right away, even the emperor of ancient China who was known as the king of the land on the coast of the land, he was also named , not really.
So from this point of view, the more people who own the limited resources on the earth, the more people who harm the interests of others. In ancient times, under the tyranny of the feudal society, there would be slaves (the slaves in China and the black slaves in Europe and the United States), and only under the local tyrants and evil gentry in modern China would there be white-haired girls.
And even if the rich are like Bill Gates, Li Ka-shing, Jack Ma, their total amount is only a small part of the limited resources of the entire world, and some resources are calculated by others' resources on their heads. The valuation of a great company is the human resources. Resources (talents) are also included, and this valuation is ultimately counted on Bill Gates, Li Ka-shing, Ma Yun, and others. If all those human resources are torn apart, the rest will be allocated to these rich people. Quasi-manpower goes in to carry out organizational integration and operation, and let the rich enjoy it slowly. Even if this amount is very, very large, it is a pile of meaningless garbage. These things can no longer bring material or spiritual enjoyment to the rich, but will become His burden, because the rich can only enjoy a very, very little, and most of them will slowly rot away, and these things can no longer create material and spiritual products for the people of the world. Garbage is converted into an intermediary that can bring material or spiritual enjoyment - money, so he must sell this pile of garbage, let another capitalist take over, and then let manpower go in to organize and integrate operations, creating material or spiritual for the people of the world. Products, this is called a limited company.
And to define whether a rich man is great or not is definitely not to say that the richer he is, the greater he is. This has been overthrown by me before, but the more rich he is, the more he will harm the interests of others, and the more rubbish and scum among mankind. It is an anti-human being, and human beings should put this kind of person to death sooner and sooner. As the intermediary of material resources, coins are equivalent to material resources in peacetime, and are equivalent to a pile of waste paper in times of war, and gold immediately takes its place, but in fact gold has always taken its place. Gold is invisible during times, but it only appears during times of war. And if one day God uses a golden finger to turn all the stones on the earth into gold, then silver will immediately take the place of gold.
Whether a rich man is great or not, then he has to talk about his heart. A person who wants to take all the limited resources in this world for himself and keeps doing it, everyone gets it and kills it, and even wants to get half or even a third, a quarter, and a fifth of the world. Don't let one...one tenth of the people let go, everyone deserves to be punished, one percent...one thousandth...one ten thousandth Don't let those who wait. There are 6 billion people in the world, and he gets 1/10,000. He is equal to violating the interests of 600,000 people. You can imagine a small city with 600,000 people. All resources are his, which means that only he can live. Everyone else has to starve to death. Do you think these 600,000 people want to kill him?
In fact, there are people who have all the resources in this small town with 600,000 people, and the other 600,000 people in this small town didn't want to kill him. Why? Think about whether Bill Gates' wealth can easily buy all the resources of a poor and backward town of 600,000 people. How many times his wealth is your wealth? It is tens of thousands of times more than many people, so have you thought about killing him? no. Why don't we want to kill him, because Bill Gates is "atonement" while accumulating wealth, he is also creating material and spiritual resources (wealth) for us, we use his operating system, and his company The various conveniences brought to us by our products are also creating wealth for many of us, so the 600,000 of us did not starve to death, but lived happily. On the contrary, we are grateful for the various convenient. It is based on this kind of cooperation that people can play happily.
Moreover, my calculation is not correct. It is very rough and rude. His assets have not been completely removed from human resources. After removing them, it is impossible for him to reach 1/10,000. Moreover, the resources on this earth are my money. To calculate, too many invisible resources are not included, how can all the mountains, rivers, lakes and seas be calculated in money? Counting these invisible resources, how can Bill Gates buy one ten thousandth of the earth? No one in this world can, and the 600,000 of us are able to survive by relying on these invisible resources that are not calculated. But here I still hate Li Ka-shing, a swindling-style capitalist who makes money everywhere. I feel that he is just a business villain. What memorable products did he leave for people all over the world? I don't have any of them. At least I was born in the mainland and never felt the most intuitively the convenience he brought to me. Maybe indirectly, but I don't know, maybe netizens can point it out. Maybe some netizens say that Li Ka-shing has invested in certain cities in the once-poor mainland and promoted the economic development of the mainland, and I have also invisibly shared this convenience in this economic development. Wow, this hat is so tall, it is taller than the tallest building in Shanghai, it really makes me look up. And what I think of is that he scraped a few waves and then left. He got what he wanted, and the mainland got what she wanted. It was just a fair deal. Moreover, this is also why Li Ka-shing follows the trend of reform and opening up, and uses this wind to make waves. He is a fool if he doesn't make him, because there will be too many other people. great trend. However, I think Bill Gates, Jobs, Jack Ma seem to be following the trend, but they don't seem to follow the trend, but live and lead a new trend, bringing the most intuitive convenience to the world. This is what they left us. The things they brought us are like poetry and novels. They are not Li Ka-shing's that only have form but no content. What they left us is spiritual and also has Physically and spiritually, we can motivate us, and we can fully enjoy and immerse ourselves in it.
Yes, we have to leave something for future generations, although the things they left to us are not what I said at the beginning: a large amount of eternal good things, whether it is material or not. spiritual. That is, what they leave us with is not very permanent, or good enough. For example, their products are easily outdated, the Win Fighter operating system and Apple mobile phones have been updated, and Ma Yun's father's Taobao shopping has been maintained and developed in a more humane way. I don't know if it will be created by other companies in the future. Replaced by services that subvert the three views of more convenient shopping methods? This is not very clear, but the possibility is very high, because now we see that the prototype that subverts the three views is the drone delivery service. And the spiritual inspiration they left us is not unique to them. Their noble spiritual qualities have been found in many other people throughout the ages. They are only typical of this era. Of course, these spiritual qualities of them do have a kind of Eternity, but if you want to compare with the great men of the entire human history, they must be compared, because those great men have more eternal things than them, and they will occupy more in the future. important location. However, in this era, they have completed the task of "a large amount" of "good things" and brought "good things" to people all over the world or a country. In later generations, let later generations comment, at least we have recognized it in this era.
Yes, I think we still have to leave something for future generations, whether it is material or spiritual or information, and I know that it is difficult to create and leave a large amount of eternal good things, After all, most of us are not geniuses but have limited aptitude, and even have major flaws, and most things have been preempted by sages and wise men, leaving behind their thick ink, let alone surpass, even if we climb on their shoulders (giants) Can't go up, it's too high, and the mountains stand up, not to mention Einstein's theory of relativity, calculus can scare most of us ordinary people, but this does not mean that God has closed all our windows, on the contrary There are many open windows and doors for us, we can work hard in the fields we are good at, silently leave our own essence, add a little color to the world, and be seen and appreciated by others, and can also inspire and inspire. other people.
Doors rock band soul frontman Jim Morrison is undoubtedly a great musician, but he's also a clear loser, the quintessential villain in our lives. He is unruly and rebellious. He is a smoker and alcoholic who smokes and drank alcohol at the concert, and is a drug addict behind the stage. He is unscrupulous on the stage of the concert, and his private life is extremely chaotic and betrayed his girlfriend for many years. How can we learn from such a person object? But when we watch this movie and fully understand his family background, we can find that his debauchery and rebelliousness comes from his fragility. His father is a naval officer who disciplines him very strictly. The harshness, in the words of Wenders' film Million Dollar Hotel, is that Jim Morrison's father's powerful ego shattered Jim Morrison's fragile Using extreme methods - bohemian, rebellious - to confront his father, to build his own strong and tenacious self, but this self seems strong and tenacious, and in the final analysis is the other extreme - fragile. The sons of billionaire media tycoons in "Million Dollar Hotel" are in exactly the same situation as Jim Morrison, equally bohemian and rebellious, equally drug-addicted, but equally gifted, poets, brilliant, sensitive Fragile, but swearing to resist. The son of the billionaire media tycoon jumped from the roof, not so much the fragile ego was smashed by reinforced concrete, but rather the powerful ego of the media tycoon.
Although Jim Morrison did not choose to commit suicide, his ego actually has a strong tendency to do so. It is obvious from watching this movie and checking his materials. His reflection on life in poetry and philosophy makes him There is a Haizi-style burning life and a strong passion for death, and he is also practicing it, but in a different way from the media tycoon's son, Jim Morrison chose the Haizi-style road - burning yourself crazy - in music creation Show your true self (tenacious and fragile) in the stage performance, so the power of this art is very intuitive, real and shocking, very infectious, so the door rock band, like Haizi, quickly accumulated a large number of fans, but these Fans don't know that they are burning themselves to death, and then to the eternity of life. In the end, Haizi committed suicide by lying on the rails in Shanhaiguan at the age of 25; Jim Morrison was only 27 years old after long-term alcoholism and drug addiction. One leaves a lot of excellent poetry, the other leaves a lot of excellent music, and leaves a strong stroke in each other's areas of expertise, and these things are of a timeless nature, which can be said to be great.
Actually, when I think of Haizi, Jim Morrison, and the son of a billion-dollar media tycoon in "The Million Dollar Hotel", I suddenly think of a physics thing - Rupert's tears, yes, this kind of thing is on earth The hardest thing is harder than diamond, and it is as transparent and bright as diamond. It can withstand 8 tons of pressure, and bullets cannot be broken at close range. But it's also the most fragile thing on earth, and it's amazing to just find its tiny, tiny weakness and shatter it with a little force. However, the birth of Rupert's Tears must also be in dire straits, which are two extremes, and they have to be embarrassing.
In the end, I hope we can all learn from the two extremes, quietly cultivate our own world in the field that we are good at, and paint a small color for the world, as long as it is small (of course, if it can be greatly improved) good), shining a small light of color, adding a small splendor to the world, and being appreciated and loved by a small number of people (of course, a big one is better), it is enough, because I feel that if We can't leave a large amount of eternal good things to future generations, whether it is material or spiritual or information, but we can leave our essence to the few people in our time, to give comfort, to each other Heating.
Finally, I end with Zhang Zao's poem: I think my good luck will come one day and I will be read and loved by so many outstanding people of Liao Ruoxing that I have imagined all my life.
View more about The Doors reviews
