The movie "The Gate" made me understand that a person is great or downright outstanding, excellent, outstanding, outstanding, not bad, is the amount of timeless good things he/she leaves (creates), whether it is Physical or spiritual or informational. In terms of the conservation of mass in physics, no one can leave things, and no one can create things, because everything has been created by (God), and all human beings are only discovered and shaped for the second time, and what we call of "creation". If the law of increasing entropy is put aside, the sun does not send light to the earth, and the meteorites do not hit the earth, the earth is an isolated system, a dead planet, and the earth cannot create anything. Even with the arrival of light and meteorites, life on earth is born and grows endlessly, but they are all repeated on the basis of the original material. Your feces and urine irrigate the vegetables, some parts of the feces and urine become part of the vegetables, and eventually you eat them. Pigs ate a lot of cheap vegetables that were irrigated with excrement and urine. After the pig was slaughtered and eaten by you, it became a part of you after being digested. After you died, you were carried into a coffin and buried. Biting, a part of you becomes a part of the mouse, and even the sperm that constitutes a male mouse comes from your flesh and blood, so you become a new-born mouse, and this little mouse is not careful one day You were trampled to death by a hungry sow, and the nutrients of the mouse just constituted the eggs of the sow, so congratulations, you have finally become a pig, and when you grow up, you will be slaughtered by humans. From this point of view, the Buddhist theory of reincarnation can indeed be explained, but I firmly oppose a certain pig who has cultivated for many lifetimes and has been a good pig in every life, "Hello, kind pig!" "Hello, , "A Maverick Pig"!" Finally, in the reincarnation of the next life, the kind-hearted pig, the maverick pig, is reincarnated as a human. And a certain person was a big bad guy in previous lives, so he was reincarnated as a pig in this life. I am firmly opposed to this view that is the same as the Christian heaven theory, this kind of intangible, invisible, unverifiable and unfalsifiable thing, you just need it, because it does not bother your life, others Let them believe, or at least let them be afraid and turn to kindness. It's just that most people don't believe in this set of things anymore, so they do evil things without any scruples. There is no hell fire. In this life, let's enjoy the happiness and longevity first, and don't care about the floods of the younger generation. Confucianism and Mohism have a very interesting difference in the theory of ghosts and gods, but the ultimate purpose is the same, both of which make people feel awe. Confucians do not believe in the punishment of ghosts and gods, but they attach great importance to the rituals of sacrifice, and respect for ancestors and dead spirits is the only way to celebrate the Qingming Festival of our Chinese nation. In ancient times, it took three years to observe filial piety. And ink The family believed in the punishment of ghosts and gods, but despised sacrificial rituals, respected festivals and burials, and denied the waste of human resources such as three-year filial piety. In fact, it has been overthrown in modern times. The biggest difference between Confucianism and Mohism is that Confucianism respects the king and Mohism respects the people. Therefore, Confucianism respects the king and respects the biological father together with the biological mother, elders, and elder brothers (the monarch, the monarch, the minister, the father, the son, the son), and the respect requires energy and wealth, so it pays attention to the burial. , pay attention to the combination of ceremonies and music, so as to appear noble and in line with the number of ceremonies. The Mohists respected the people and advocated "saving use", "feasting on burials", "not having fun", and "enduring hardships", so they wanted to bring the king to the same status as the commoners, and demanded that the king should be the same as the commoners. In fact, if you think about it with your butt, you will know that everyone likes to be flattered, and those in power prefer it, so the Confucianism and Moism that were once attacked in the Yingzheng era, in the later period when Confucianism came to power, Moism quickly disappeared. Of course, this is also related to the fact that most of the Confucians came from the children of scholarly families, and most of the Mohists came from the children of farmers. That is to say, it is related to the basic plan, and the direction of maintenance is different. Even if the farmers are born and believe in Confucianism, they still want to use the power of the king to build a scholarly family and protect future generations. Of course, this is all Whether it is a supplement (basic game), their biggest goal is still the world, which is the greatest glory. The Mohists never thought about their own selfishness. They only thought about the people. No matter how hard or tired they were, they would be willing to die. Even if they died, they would "die without turning their heels." From this point of view, the Mohists were indeed better than the Confucians. Greater and more earth-shattering chivalrous spirit, this is how Mo Xia came. The knights and knights we are talking about now all inherit the spirit of the Mo family. Too much nonsense. I give the example of pigs and mice to illustrate that it is impossible for human beings to create things. The so-called creation is to create something from nothing. It is almost impossible to create something from nothing, because it is also constrained by the law of conservation of mass and energy in physics. Given a mass of air, it is absolutely impossible for you to create a balloon out of thin air. So from nothing, this is God's business, it is the hypothesis of the mystery of the origin of the universe - the big bang, this is not our human business, we humans can only transform things on the basis of things, that is, the second shaping, Because what we have on earth has already existed in the universe. And other such as the various laws in the universe and earth are learned by us and we call it discovery, and the discovery and the second shaping we collectively call it-creation. At this time, someone must have questioned me, is there a book "Dream of Red Mansions" in the extraterrestrial universe? It is difficult for me to answer this question, because from the perspective of parallel cosmology, there must be, and there are infinite versions, but parallel cosmology is as difficult to prove as the Buddhist theory of reincarnation and the Christian theory of heaven and falsification. But I want to say from the law of conservation of mass and conservation of mass and energy, are all the textures of the book "A Dream of Red Mansions" including paper, thread and ink the basic substances on earth? Are these substances brought by humans from alien planets, or created from the air? Even if it was taken from an alien planet, it was not created by humans. Therefore, the essence of the book "A Dream of Red Mansions" is still the second shaping of human beings, and the text of "A Dream of Red Mansions" is great. things that are called information, such as ideas, literature, music, programming languages, etc., are all built on matter, and without matter, they have nothing to rely on. When I say this, many materialists immediately applaud, but I am about to make a rake. I want to say that without thinking and logic (human subjectivity), it is impossible for human beings to transform things and carry out secondary shaping. It is impossible for pigs, mice and dogs to build a pile of snow into snow pigs, snow mice, snow dogs or even snowmen, but people can build snowmen, snow pigs, snow mice and snow dogs. This is called creation. Give a child a handful of mud, and he can squeeze a lot of things, including little mud pigs, but little pigs can't squeeze little mud figurines. Give you a pen, you can write and draw, write a letter to your distant lover or draw a sketch of your lover to solve lovesickness. And give you a guitar, you can play the sound, but you may not be able to play a harmonious and beautiful sound. To play a harmonious and beautiful sound, you have to learn the knowledge of rhythm. The knowledge of rhythm, the intangible acoustic psychological and logical knowledge, is the product of the accumulation of human experience. It comes from the sounds made by various objects and the laws of these sounds. It is precisely when human beings have mastered these laws that they are manipulated. By organizing these sounds, music is born. Then human beings learned to save the music records before they can get the music scores, so that future generations can play and restore the music of the predecessors according to the music scores, which is very different from the music played by the predecessors. Then human beings learned to save the music records and then they had turntables, gramophones, CDs and amplifiers. Now they only need a mobile computer and a pair of headphones to enjoy Beethoven's music two hundred years ago, and Beethoven left behind What you hear is the audio and video products (such as vinyl records) recorded during the restoration of the performance by later generations, and then digitized (binary) and saved in the mobile computer. A song file (media file) in other formats ). From vinyl records to media files is a creation (analog signal carrier to digital signal carrier), and from media files to your earphones to make the sound heard by you is another creation (digital signal carrier to analog signal carrier to restoration sound). Creation is everywhere in the human world, It has changed the living habits of human beings and made human life better. And whoever creates the greater quantity of eternal good, whether material or spiritual or informational, he/she can be called great. Down below are outstanding, excellent, excellent, outstanding, not bad. And is a person who makes a lot of money (he/he will be used later) considered great? No, because according to the law of conservation of mass, all the money in the world is made by printing machines. As long as human beings are willing, human beings can use all the substances on the earth to make money. The substances on the globe are limited. Even if you use the sunlight that shines into the earth and the meteorites that smash into the earth to make money, even if you see the sun shining in endlessly, the sun itself is limited. Moreover, the conversion rate of sunlight is almost zero. It is difficult to imagine that someone would build a cauldron like the 500-meter-aperture spherical radio telescope in Guizhou to receive sunlight (light particles) and convert them into matter. What humans often do is to build a dam to form a large pot to catch the rainwater from the sky for farmland irrigation or daily drinking water. And a meteorite has to wait for many years or even hundreds of thousands of years to hit the earth. A very huge meteorite can almost wipe out most of the life on earth, or even destroy it. And most meteorites have been burned into gas in the atmosphere, and it will take a long time for its dust to slowly fall to the earth. And a person who takes all the money printed by the yarn printing machine and scrapes it into his own hands is equivalent to taking possession of the oceans, rivers, lakes, ponds, and wells on the earth, and not giving others a way to live. In fact, he himself can only use a tiny little bit. I know there are many people who have this idea, but no one has ever actually done it, because the others will kill him right away, even the emperor of ancient China who was known as the king of the land on the coast of the land, he was also named , not really. So from this point of view, the more people who own the limited resources on the earth, the more people who harm the interests of others. In ancient times, under the tyranny of the feudal society, there would be slaves (slaves in China, black slaves in Europe and America), and only under the local tyrants and evil gentry in modern China would there be white-haired girls. And even if the rich are like Bill Gates, Li Ka-shing and Jack Ma, their total amount is only a small part of the limited resources of the entire world, and some resources are also counted on their heads by other people's resources. The valuation of a great company also includes human resources (talents), and this valuation is ultimately counted on Bill Gates, Li Ka-shing, Jack Ma, and others. If all those human resources are eliminated, the rest will be Things are only allocated to these rich people. No more manpower is allowed to go in for organizational integration and operation, and the rich can enjoy it slowly. Even if the amount is very, very large, it is a pile of meaningless garbage. These things can no longer be brought. Giving rich people material or spiritual enjoyment will actually become a burden to them, because the rich can only enjoy a very, very little, and most of them will slowly rot away. And these things can no longer create material and spiritual products for the people of the world. The rich must convert this pile of rubbish into an intermediary that can bring material or spiritual enjoyment - money, so he must sell this pile of rubbish, Let another capitalist take over and then let manpower in to carry out organizational integration operations and create material or spiritual products for the people of the world, which is called a limited company. And to define whether a rich person is great or not is definitely not to say that the richer he is, the greater he is. This has been overthrown by me before, but the more money he is, the more he will harm the interests of others, and the more rubbish and scum among mankind. It is an anti-human being. Humans should put this kind of person to death sooner and sooner, because when he scrapes half of the resources on the earth, it means that half of the people on the earth will starve to death because of him alone. As the intermediary of material resources, coins are equivalent to material resources in peacetime, and are equivalent to a pile of waste paper in times of war, and gold immediately takes its place, but in fact gold has always taken its place. Gold is invisible during times, but it only appears during times of war. And if one day God uses a golden finger to turn all the stones on the earth into gold, then silver will immediately take the place of gold. Whether a rich man is great or not, then he has to talk about his heart. A person who wants to take all the limited resources in the world for himself and keeps doing it, everyone gets it and kills it, and even wants to get half or even one-third, one-third, one-fifth of the world Don't let one...one out of ten, everyone deserves to be punished, one percent...one thousandth... Don't let the one in ten thousand wait. There are 6 billion people in the world, and he gets 1/10,000. He is equal to violating the interests of 600,000 people. You can imagine a small city with 600,000 people. All resources are his, which means that only he can live. Everyone else has to starve to death. Do you think these 600,000 people want to kill him? In fact, there are people who have all the resources in this small town with 600,000 people, and the other 600,000 people in this small town didn't want to kill him. Why? Think about whether Bill Gates' wealth can easily buy all the resources of a poor and backward town of 600,000 people. How many times his wealth is your wealth? It is tens of thousands of times more than many people, so have you thought about killing him? no. Why don't we want to kill him, because Bill Gates is "atonement" while accumulating wealth, he is also creating material and spiritual resources (wealth) for us, we use his operating system, and his company The various conveniences brought to us by our products are also creating wealth for many of us, so the 600,000 of us did not starve to death, but lived happily. On the contrary, we are grateful for the various convenient. It is based on this kind of cooperation that people can play happily. Moreover, my calculation is not correct. It is very rough and rude. His assets have not been completely removed from human resources. After removing them, it is impossible for him to reach 1/10,000. Moreover, the resources on this earth are my money. To calculate, too many invisible resources are not included in the calculation. How can all the mountains, rivers, lakes and seas be calculated in money? If these invisible resources are counted, how can Bill Gates' assets buy ten thousandths of the earth? one? One in a billion can't buy it. No one in this world can, and the 600,000 of us are able to survive by relying on these invisible resources that are not calculated. But here I still hate Li Ka-shing, a swindling-style capitalist who makes money everywhere. I feel that he is just a business villain. What memorable products did he leave for people all over the world? I don't have any of them. At least I was born in the mainland and never felt the most intuitively the convenience he brought to me. Maybe indirectly, but I don't know, maybe netizens can point it out. Maybe some netizens say that Li Ka-shing has invested in certain cities in the once-poor mainland and promoted the economic development of the mainland, and I have also invisibly shared this convenience in this economic development. Wow, this hat is so tall, it is taller than the tallest building in Shanghai, it really makes me look up. And what I think of is that he scraped a few waves and then left, he got what he wanted, and the mainland got what she wanted. Just a flat transaction. Moreover, this is also why Li Ka-shing follows the trend of reform and opening up, and uses this wind to make the tide. If he doesn't make him, he is a fool, because there will be too many other people. This is not he alone can control this great trendy. But I think Bill Gates, Jobs, Jack Ma seem to be following the trend, but they don't seem to follow the trend, but live and lead a new trend, bringing the most intuitive convenience to the world. This is what they left us. The things they brought us are like poetry and novels. They are not Li Ka-shing's that only have form but no content. What they left us is spiritual and also has What motivates us materially and spiritually is their character, and materially is their product, allowing us to fully enjoy and immerse ourselves in it. Yes, we have to leave something for future generations, although the things that Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Jack Ma left to us are not exactly in line with what I mean by "a lot of timeless good things", that is, What they leave us with is not very permanent, or good enough. For example, their products are easily outdated. The Win Fighter operating system and Apple mobile phones are constantly being updated. If they are not updated, they will be replaced by other people's products. Ma Yun's father's Taobao shopping platform has been maintained and developed in a more humane direction, but I don't know if it will be replaced by other companies' services that create more disruptive and more convenient shopping methods in the future? This is not very clear, but the possibility is very high, because now seeing the most disruptive prototype is the drone home delivery service, it is exciting and anticipating to think about it. And the spiritual encouragement they left us is not unique to them. Their noble spiritual characters have been found in many other people throughout the ages. They are only typical of this era. Of course, these spiritual characters of them do have a kind of Eternity, but if you want to compare with the great men of the entire human history, they must be compared, because those great men have more eternal things than them, and they will occupy more in the future. Important positions, Einstein, Newton, Li Bai, Du Fu and many others will be greater than them for a long time. However, in this era, they have completed the task of "a large amount" of "good things" and brought "good things" to the people of the whole world or a country. In later generations, let later generations comment, at least we have recognized it in this era. Yes, I think we still have to leave something for posterity, whether it's material or spiritual or informational, and I know a lot of it Eternal good things are difficult to create and leave behind. After all, most of us are not geniuses but have limited aptitude, and even have major flaws, and most things have been preempted by sages, wise men and great people, leaving behind their thick ink. , let's not talk about transcendence, even if we climb on their (giants) shoulders, we can't even climb on them (giants), it is too high, and the mountains stand up, not to mention Einstein's theory of relativity, calculus can scare most of us ordinary people, but this It does not mean that God has closed all our windows. On the contrary, there are many open windows and doors for us. We can work silently in the fields we are good at, and finally burst out our essence, adding a little color to the world. It can also be seen and appreciated by others, and it can also inspire others. Doors rock band soul frontman Jim Morrison is a great musician, but he's also a clear loser, the quintessential villain of our lives. He is unruly and rebellious. He smokes cigarettes and smokes at concerts and drinks alcohol to satirize the audience. He criticizes the government and the police for unscrupulous smokers and alcoholics. He is a drug addict behind the stage. How are people the object of our study? But when we watch this movie and fully understand his family background, we can find that his debauchery and rebelliousness comes from his fragility. His father is a naval officer who disciplines him very strictly. The harshness, in the words of Wenders' film Million Dollar Hotel, is that Jim Morrison's father's powerful ego shatters Jim Morrison's fragile Using the most extreme ways - bohemian, rebellious - to confront his father, in order to establish his strong and tenacious self, but this self seems strong and tenacious, and in the final analysis is the other extreme - fragile. The son of a billionaire media mogul in "The Million Dollar Hotel" is in exactly the same situation as Jim Morrison, equally bohemian and rebellious, equally drug-addicted, but equally gifted and talented, both poets, both sensitive and vulnerable, but And swore to resist. The son of the billionaire media tycoon jumped from the roof, not so much the fragile ego was smashed by reinforced concrete, but rather the powerful ego of the media tycoon. Although Jim Morrison did not choose to commit suicide, his ego actually has a strong tendency to do so. It is obvious from watching this movie and checking his information. His reflections on life in poetry and philosophy make him There is a Haizi-style burning life with a strong passion for death, and he is also practicing it, but in a different way from the media tycoon's son, Jim Morrison chose the Haizi-style road - crazy burning self. Self - show your true self (tenacious and fragile) in music creation and stage performance, so the power of this art is very intuitive, real and shocking, very contagious, so the door rock band is also like Haizi. Accumulated a large number of fans, but these fans do not know that they are burning themselves to march towards death, and then reach the eternity of life. Haizi committed suicide by lying on the rail in Shanhaiguan at the age of 25; Jim Morrison was only 27 years old after long-term alcoholism and drug addiction. One leaves a lot of excellent poetry, the other leaves a lot of excellent music, and leaves a strong stroke in each other's areas of expertise, and these things are of a timeless nature, which can be said to be great. Someone once described Jim Morrison in the famous words of the poet Rimbaud, "His life was a feast, where all hearts were opened and all wines poured out." This sentence is very apt, talented Extraordinarily talented people burn their own lives, how can they not be magnificent and magnificent? And it happens that Jim Morrison is a big fan of the poet Rimbaud. Actually, when I think of Haizi, Jim Morrison, and the son of a billion-dollar media tycoon in "The Million Dollar Hotel", I suddenly think of a physics thing - Rupert's tears, yes, this kind of thing is on earth The hardest thing is harder than diamond, and it is as transparent and bright as diamond. It can withstand 8 tons of pressure, and bullets cannot be broken at close range. But it is also the most fragile and fragile thing on earth. Just find its tiny weakness, and it will shatter with a little force. It is amazing. However, the birth of Rupert's Tears must also be in dire straits, which are two extremes, which are unavoidable and embarrassing. In the end, I hope that we can all learn from the two extremes, quietly cultivate our own world in the field that we are good at, and paint a small color for the world, as long as it is small (of course, if it can be greatly improved) good), shining a small light of color, adding a small splendor to the world, and a small number of people can appreciate and love (of course, a big one is better), it is enough, because I think, If we can't leave a large amount of eternal good things to future generations, whether material or spiritual or information, but we can leave our most beautiful things to the few people who like us in this era, Give comfort, give encouragement, and keep each other warm, and you will live up to this life. Finally, I end with Zhang Zao's poem: I think my good luck will come one day and I will be read and loved by so many outstanding people of Liao Ruoxing that I have imagined all my life.
View more about The Doors reviews
