MAN WHO RAISE THE BIG CATS. OR MAN WHO COME CLOSE TO BIG CATS. ALL THEY WANT IS LOOK AT ME.
Watch it because Cui Wa recommended it.
At first I thought it was a whitewashing documentary. After all, no matter which party it is, they all show a gesture of understanding and caring for animals. They pet it, they feed it fine meat, they nurse it, they give it play and play. Just like anyone who raise an animal as a pet.
So, what's the difference? This will be the first question.
I agree with that producer: This is just pure hate. Carol and Joe are pretty much doing the same thing. Only the other one has a good title.
I saw them all take care of these animals. The drug dealer said there is no wild anymore. And I agree with that.
And you see, these animals, or particularly "big cats" are given foods for free, which they need to chase and fight in the wild.
However, as you look, you will see that things are getting more and more difficult. These people make huge profits from the cubs, encourage the trade of wild animals (not out of the wild but bring them from the wild to Greater America), and then abandon the tiger or animal when it becomes an adult because they can't keep it. Like some partners who abandoned their pets because they had kids. Or someone who adopts a child and then finds that the child can't be taught and abandons them. They need to support them at first, and then when they find that they are not capable enough, they don't go to some agencies for help, but just throw them away. cause danger or plant a bomb.
Then these people who work for them are like slaves. Yes, slaves. A year ago, a friend told me that there are still slaves in this world. I still don't believe it. I believed it after watching the film (of course, there are worse situations than them, at least they still have salaries). First of all, it must be stated that no matter how nice a slave owner is to his slaves, this relationship is not normal. In the film, there are people who were forced to have breast implants, who lived in containers full of rats, and who could only eat food that was expired or not in the supermarket. If anyone say this is OK and normal and this is not slavery, f**k off, I will fight everyone of you.
Even better, conspiracy theories. a disappearing husband. A person who could be eaten by a tiger. These eye-catching, explosive crime news. Coupled with the frenzy of emerging media such as FB and IG, the contradiction has been exacerbated.
To stalk others out of animal protection or commercial interests, write a complaint letter to the mall. There are a lot more that I haven't watched yet, but they must be exciting, and I'll add them later.
my point of view. If these people can go all the way with cats and dogs, and keep everything safe, do it. But this is not possible. One, they still want to eat people when they are hungry. Two, they have no space. Three, many are cubs brought back from the wild and forced to leave their habitat, their own relatives, would a person who loves animals do this? When you travel, if you see a cute child on the street, you won’t just kidnap him, lock him up for a few years, and then let him out into a bigger cage and tell him I love you (there is indeed such a person, but there is a special term for him) They are called human traffickers or kidnappers, who do illegal and criminal things and go to jail). So, as World Animal Protection says, there is no harm without buying and selling. Uncle Yao Ming told you so, why is it so itchy to take pictures with wild animals?
At least on this point, Carol was right. Their pictures all say one thing: "Look at me. Look at me! Look at me!!!" That's it.
There is another proof that they have their own TV stations, reality shows, music videos, and a whole lot of self-marketing stuff since ancient times. That's it.
View more about Tiger King reviews
