Regardless of the labels Disney and Pierce brought to this cartoon, just looking at the theme of dinosaurs and the relatively clear and lively composition made me decide to let my two children watch it - it should be an animation that is suitable for each size.
Ploughing fields, irrigating, storing grain, raising poultry, doing what farmers do in the unique way of dinosaurs, grazing of Tyrannosaurus Rex, calling humans beasts and treating them as pets that can be given away, etc. Got a size. What is the purpose of such a role reversal? Is it to let children further reflect on the relationship between man and nature? The strength should not be enough, because it is a little bit of whitewashing. Using animals to tell human stories, rather than using animals to tell animal stories, is low-level.
Here's a detail worth checking out: when Aro and the minibus talked about their family at night, I thought and hoped that there would be such a plot: one of them put the branch representing the other side in his circle , or place your own branch in the opponent's circle. The former is commitment, the latter is dedication. In the process of advancing the story, the two of them have achieved these two points, but they do not have enough strength and love to become each other's "family", which paved the way for the later parting ways. It also makes the liver and gallbladder photo in the process not so heartwarming. What is friendship? But it is life and death, but it still separates the belly.
Maybe I'm old enough to watch these kinds of cartoons and feel deja vu. "The Lion King" and "Zootopia" all have similar themes: the weak counterattack, gain strength in friendship, family love is the ultimate value that cannot be surpassed... However, Arrow's warm memories of home seem to only portray him and The details between the fathers, which made his obsession with coming home seem abrupt and unrealistic; and the friendship, as I said earlier, was painless. Saying that you have the courage to let go is actually just not enough love.
And what does "growing up" mean? Growing up means that you can put your own footprints on the warehouse, but what is the measure of growing up? Why does Aro's older brothers and sisters only need to complete a certain skill to grow up, while Aro has to go through disaster? Does this "footprint" represent some kind of rigid evaluation standard, some kind of restriction on minor children within the family?
The writing is relatively scattered, because it is not profound in itself.
View more about The Good Dinosaur reviews
