The relationship is as good-looking as the work, and the seemingly mismatched and conflicting emotions are evenly matched. Work is the blank of feelings, and feelings are the blank of work.
Adhere to professional opinions, don’t give in easily, and don’t try to please leaders at will. This is a good subordinate code for breaking the culture and cross-industry. The first time we met, we asked questions about whether public remarks were private, consistent in words and deeds, the same in appearance, and two people cherished each other and admired each other. Even if they did not develop into love, they still reached the standard of top-level friendship (comrades-in-arms or opponents, the same). This is also the first lesson I have learned from the professor. I teach by words and deeds, and I am familiar with it. There is no dogma. Luckily for me.
Be concise and to the point, half of a sentence is enough, the second half can be left blank, and the same is true for questions and answers. When the male and female protagonists communicate political differences, they both pay great attention to the proportion of language, not only to convey clearly, but also to take care of each other's emotions, and not to speak out. Precise language with a sense of lines, natural and rich facial expressions, extremely tacit understanding. The expression of restraint brings a sense of rhythm and ritual. Extending to the work area is tacit understanding, and the love area is sexual tension.
It turns out that I feel that expressing emotions at work is a negative thing, and I always want to control my emotions. But the second lesson the professors and mentors taught me was, no need. Natural expression, real, accurate, but not out of bounds. For example, anger is anger, doubt is doubt, reservation is reservation, approval is approval, and the scale can be corrected by adding conditional adverbial. For example, when the male protagonist has a ptsd attack, his first thought must be guilt, and he wants to explain to his lover, but when he asks if he wants to change his bodyguard job, the female protagonist can immediately respond to his emotions without concealing his hesitation. Another example is the dialogue when eating takeout. The rhythm and sensitivity of the emotional expression of the two are highly matched. What is not love? Experiencing life and death together is just a catalyst. Of course, a catalyst is indispensable. Otherwise, the cautious and restrained two people are probably still playing chess in their heads...
The last is the famous scene. The first half is to work separately, which is good for everyone, and the second half is to reveal the truth. The commitment without additional time adverbial is more weighty.
View more about Bodyguard reviews
