"Why should it cost a million for something that can be done for a hundred dollars?"

Napoleon 2022-10-01 00:27:45

As far as the plot is concerned, the most impressive thing after reading it is this sentence, which also reflects how the Secret Service without budget constraints is madly wasting taxpayers' money.

Why do you say that? Thinking about the beginning of the movie, colleagues in the Technical Department of the Secret Service, who were obsessed with making all kinds of weapons of mass destruction, while pursuing greater lethality and concealment, had collectively forgotten that these props were made to make Opponents are incapacitated so that agent operations are not disrupted. In the absence of such non-lethal uniform props, these props are of course extraordinarily useful, but the damage caused is simply innumerable - collateral damage to innocent people and corresponding compensation, building damage, infrastructure damage, etc. All these are free of money? .

I didn't have a choice before. When there is a prop that can subdue others non-lethally, everyone in the Secret Service actually thinks this prop is a freak? It is true that the plot speculates that the stability of the props may not have been tested in actual combat, but on the other hand, is the hostility behind the smile of the Secret Service a little too heavy?

This kind of thing doesn't just happen to this cartoon and the secret agents. Think about it, from the administrative departments such as the courts who sent sentences strictly in accordance with the law but stumbled upon unreasonable cases, but they can only maintain the dignity of the law and suppress them with procedural justice. Questioning voices, and then to private enterprises such as the establishment of a performance appraisal system was originally intended to encourage everyone to pay more and gain more, but in the end it became a distribution tool for games and internal struggles. In fact, short-term procedural justice is necessary, because without rigid procedures, there is no standard for reference implementation, and these constraints cannot be realized; but being controlled by procedural justice, even forgetting the original purpose, and doing things that can be done for one hundred yuan prefers to Spend 10,000, 100,000, 1 million, it can only be said that this organization is really rich to burn.

Having said that, now I feel more and more that the phrase "don't forget the original intention, forge ahead" is reasonable. Everyone is out to do things, don't go astray by doing things, dear.

View more about Spies in Disguise reviews

Extended Reading

Spies in Disguise quotes

  • Walter Beckett: I should have a codename. Bond. Hydrogen Bond.

  • Walter Beckett: What if I could make you... pause for effect, drumroll please... disappeeeear?

    Lance Sterling: What?

    Walter Beckett: Disappeeeear.

    Lance Sterling: Why are you saying it like that?

    Walter Beckett: For effeeeect.