The long shot at the beginning and end of the film, entering the theater situation. When he was bound to the Eros pillar, the halo of the characters in the dim screen was shocking.
In such a limited time and space, the emotions, reactions, behaviors of originally irrelevant characters, as well as the psychology, social attributes, and philosophical logic of very rational people, can be organically connected without violation and harmony, then the screenwriter and performance are both admirable. .
The form and content of the choreographed drama are blended together, and the performance and reality are gradually indistinguishable, and the two are ambiguous. In the way of deconstructing the novel, the story is reconstructed, making the impossible gradually possible and convincing. If the novel is simply reproduced beautifully, the audience will only watch it with a curious and rare exception, and will not have a personal experience.
What I don’t like very much is also a closed space, rehearsing and practicing life on stage, script, literature, theory, and psychology – the more you play, the more tired you get from life. An intriguing setting in the play: the performer is simply the playwright's ideal prototype for "Venus in Fur", perfectly interpreting this artistic image, but she looks completely vulgar and vulgar at the moment of her life when she is not performing. Narrow and boring. Friends, those who live like a duck to water in life are always those who just live and work without asking about the future and the past, ideas and meanings.
Literature, art, poets - a group of visionaries who are powerless and exiled by life, a group of lunatics...
View more about Venus in Fur reviews
