00:01:12 [Narrator] The people here will tell you... (Listen, here's the thing. The translation is not very good.) You can live by playing cards. This is a kind of job. You don't gamble. Then You can only do hard work. Your goal is to win a big bet in an hour. It's as simple as that. Shoot at the best time and guard when it's bad. You can't lose anything. Half of my law school That’s how the tuition comes from. A real hard worker. －－－－－－－－－－－－ 00:20:12 When the insect prison came out and sat on the jeep playing card tricks, he was alone. The other is in the aisle. 00:27:00 [Narrator] In the confession of a successful poker player, Jack King said, "It’s a very strange phenomenon. There are very few bets. I remember how I won, but each of them remembered exactly how I was defeated. "It was correct for me. Because when I walked in here, I can’t remember how I won the money. I came, but I can't stop thinking about how I lost. The narrative here is completely opposite to the view in Teacher Li Xiaolai's "Take Time as a Friend" (it says that people's instincts will naturally forget the pain). Both of them are justifying their arguments, and both are somewhat convincing. The differences and fusions are worth pondering. When narrating this passage, he walked into the village poker game, overcame the public's prejudice against playing cards, recovered his mindfulness of playing cards, and then had a follow-up argument (explanation) with his girlfriend: －－－－ －－－－－－－－－－ 00:42:12 m Why are the same 5 people every year...Where are the finals of the World Cup poker tournament? What are they, the most lucky people in Las Vegas Does it? m This requires skill, Joe. —— j is good. Then why do you lie to me? m because I know you don’t understand. What does j understand? m last night, I was sitting at the table. This is I felt my existence for the first time after I failed in the KGB. j You just told me that you were at the gaming table and felt your existence for the first time. m No, but... j What do you want me to understand? ? m [sigh] ------ 00:52:45 Oh, God. Mike, she dumped you. I keep telling her that she can be a good card Hand.-Know when to let go of the worst card. No, she was a good... I knew it. I fuckin' knew it. Faced with his girlfriend's breakup, he actually explained it with cards, just like the kid who liked Warcraft used gold coins as a general equivalent, such as three steamed buns##gold coins instead of 1 yuan money 00:54:00 This background voice was very praised ———————————————— 01:30:16 The protagonist went to Knish to borrow money, explaining that the card game at the beginning of the movie was because of his own ability. He defeated the world champion Chen. The two players have different values. Knish has a calm and almost inhuman professional philosophy, and Mike likes cards and wants to be the strongest. Although I did not borrow the money, I got the approval of my friends + seniors-01:37:12 [Narrator] I often see these people, these cards, at the table. Short-term big wins and Long-term victory or defeat, they are all out, and the last card can help them. I always wonder why they played so badly... why they think they can pull it back. Walking here makes me a little uneasy Brick wall. The gloomy people at the gaming table. Very musty smell. But what choice do I have? The last plot is not well arranged. It may be due to the need of the film framework to compress the plot into one In a tense and full card game. But in fact it breaks away from the principles of players, relying on long-term statistics and probability, human insights on the spot, and the ability to deal with luck (uncertainty). However, if you want a certain "win" in a short scene, it comes to the level of "gambling". For example, in the Las Vegas Tournament, it is always those five people who come to the end, but not always the one who gets the first place. －－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－Short-term big wins and long-term wins and losses, they are all out, and the last card can help them. I always wonder why they played so badly...why do they think they can make it back. Walking here , Makes me a little uneasy. Brick wall. The sullen people at the gaming table. Very musty smell. But what choice do I have? The last plot is not very well arranged, probably because of the need for the framework of the movie. Compress the plot into a game full of tension and emotions. But in fact it breaks away from the principles of players, relying on long-term statistics and probability, human insights on the spot, and the ability to deal with luck (uncertainty). However, if you want a certain "win" in a short scene, it comes to the level of "gambling". For example, in the Las Vegas Tournament, it is always those five people who come to the end, but not always the one who gets the first place. －－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－Short-term big wins and long-term wins and losses, they are all out, and the last card can help them. I always wonder why they played so badly...why do they think they can make it back. Walking here , Makes me a little uneasy. Brick wall. The sullen people at the gaming table. Very musty smell. But what choice do I have? The last plot is not very well arranged, probably because of the need for the framework of the movie. Compress the plot into a game full of tension and emotions. But in fact it breaks away from the principles of players, relying on long-term statistics and probability, human insights on the spot, and the ability to deal with luck (uncertainty). However, if you want a certain "win" in a short scene, it comes to the level of "gambling". For example, in the Las Vegas Tournament, it is always those five people who come to the end, but not always the one who gets the first place. －－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
If you "missed" the first sentence of the movie, you basically missed the entire movie. Did you miss it? I like products as much as Mike likes playing cards. Although I may not be as smart as him, fortunately, the "product" type of work is quite popular in the current environment. Other not listed
View more about Rounders reviews
