Excellent structure, not enough digging

Davonte 2022-04-23 07:02:36

The radish is indeed portrayed in a three-pointed manner, especially from the back, he imitates Chaplin's walking posture, which is too similar, and the sad side of Chaplin's real life outside the big screen is well expressed. Tribute to Radish and Chaplin.

Isabel 2021-12-22 08:01:21

Wipe off the makeup on the face, revealing the life behind the screen. The time span is as long as 80 years, and the chronological approach is advancing. Although a fictional biographer and Chaplin are used to dialogue with Chaplin, the transition is aided by the voiceover, but the overall account is still sloppy. Nearly ten years have passed since each scene switched, and the important things at each stage were selected, with more emphasis on the love history of Chaplin and his multiple wives, and the experience of creating movies slightly lighter. A lot of things are mentioned in a flash. It is necessary to fully understand the relationship between the characters and the social background, but this movie alone may not be enough. -When we appreciate Chaplin’s works, we tend to ignore his background in emigrating to the United States from the United Kingdom. His failure to join the army in the First World War made him lose his country’s conditions. After being expelled from his homeland, he eventually had to live in Switzerland for more than a year. From an artistic perspective, each has fan views, but from the perspective of social influence, he is the greatest comedian of the 20th century. (PS. The director of this film is the director of Gandhi Biography in 1982)